Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of Multifocal Lens

Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Intraocular Lens

Treatments: Procedure: bifocal lens 3; Procedure: trifocal lens; Procedure: bifocal lens 2; Procedure: bifocal lens 1

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03586271

SHIRB2018016

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is a prospective, consecutive, nonrandomized,comparative study. Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens and Two Bifocal Intraocular Lenses

Full description

Multifocal intraocular lenses were introduced in the 1980s and have the benefit of promoting near and far vision simultaneous. However, these multifocal lenses have the disadvantages, including lower contrast sensitivity(CS) and visual discomfort, such as halos, glares and starburst, et al. Therefore, careful patient selection is crucial to achieve good postoperative results. The purpose of this study was to compare the visual outcomes and subjective visual quality between bifocal intraocular Lens(ReSTOR +2.5/+ 3.0D and Diff-aay) and trifocal intraocular Lens(AT Lisa tri 839MP). This prospective, nonrandomized, consecutive, comparative study included the assessment of 60 patients implanted with multifocal intraocular lens. visual acuity was tested in all cases. Ophthalmological evaluation included the measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), the analysis of contrast sensitivity (CS), visual defocus curve, spectacle independence, patient satisfaction, residual sphere, spherical equivalent (SE), cylinder and complications.

Enrollment: 60 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 40 to 90 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• cataract

Exclusion criteria

• existence of any corneal disease;
• previous eye surgery;
• illiteracy;
• previous refractive surgery;
• expected postoperative corneal astigmatism more than 1.00D;
• higer-order aberration more than 0.3;
• spherical aberration more than 0.3μm;
• intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Trial design

60 participants in 4 patient groups

trifocal lens

Description:

trifocal lens implantation(AT Lisa tri 839MP)

Treatment:

Procedure: bifocal lens 1

Procedure: bifocal lens 2

Procedure: bifocal lens 3

bifocal lens 1

Description:

bifocal lens implantation(Diff-aay)

Treatment:

Procedure: bifocal lens 2

Procedure: bifocal lens 3

Procedure: trifocal lens

bifocal lens 2

Description:

bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +3.0D)

Treatment:

Procedure: bifocal lens 1

Procedure: bifocal lens 3

Procedure: trifocal lens

bifocal lens 3

Description:

bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +2.5D)

Treatment:

Procedure: bifocal lens 1

Procedure: bifocal lens 2

Procedure: trifocal lens