Comparison of the Vividtrac™ and Other Videolaryngoscopes in Clinical Practice

University of Pecs

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Intubation;Difficult

Treatments: Device: Vividtrac videolaryngoscope; Device: KingVision videolaryngoscope; Device: Direct laryngoscopy

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03271008

6328

Details and patient eligibility

About

Comparison of various videolaryngoscope devices (Vividtrac™ and KingVision™) and direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh blade regarding laryngoscopy time, intubation time, intubation success rate, percentage of visible glottic opening (POGO score) in elective and acute clinical anaesthesiology practice.

Enrollment: 150 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• written informed consent
• over 18 years of age
• elective intervention
• no anticipated difficult airway or intubation
• preoperative anaesthesia risk assessment by American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification: ASA grade I-II

Exclusion criteria

Trial design

Primary purpose: Supportive Care

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

150 participants in 3 patient groups

Macintosh laryngoscopy

Active Comparator group

Description:

In this group intubation attempt is carried out with a standard Macintosh (size 3 or 4) direct laryngoscopy blade.

Treatment:

Device: Direct laryngoscopy

KingVision videolaryngoscope

Active Comparator group

Description:

In this group intubation attempt is carried out with KingVision videolaryngoscope with a channeled, disposable single-use blade.

Treatment:

Device: KingVision videolaryngoscope

VividTrac videolaryngoscope

Active Comparator group

Description:

In this group intubation attempt is carried out with VividTrac Adult model using a smartphone or laptop running the VividVision proprietary software.

Treatment:

Device: Vividtrac videolaryngoscope