ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of Three Types of Sutures in Oral Surgery. Study of Bacterial Colonization, Tissue Reaction and Clinical Characteristics: Randomized Clinical Study

U

University of Granada (UGR)

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Oral Surgery
Third Molar Extraction
Oral Infection
Wound Healing Complication

Treatments

Other: To Compare 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06864559
2028/CEIH/2021

Details and patient eligibility

About

Considering the wide variety of surgical sutures currently marketed in the field of Dentistry, it was decided to conduct a study comparing the microbial adhesion and antibacterial activity of three different types of sutures used in Oral Surgery (Silk, non-absorbable polyamide monofilament and non-absorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene).

Full description

The general or primary objective is:

• To compare 3 non-absorbable suture materials used in oral surgery: silk, polyamide monofilament and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.

The specific or secondary objectives are:

  • To evaluate how each type of suture influences wound healing and the patient's postoperative period.
  • To study bacterial colonization in each type of suture.
  • To determine the tissue reaction and clinical characteristics of each suture.

Enrollment

24 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with indication for extraction of a third lower molar retained in an unfavorable position that requires a bayonet incision in the surgical procedure.
  • Age: patients aged 18 years or older.
  • ASA I patients (Classification of the American Society of Anesthesiology, 1979): healthy patients who tolerate stress well, without systemic pathology, no anxiety and in whom a therapeutic modification is not necessary.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Smoking patients.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

24 participants in 3 patient groups

Suture 1: Silk.
Other group
Description:
Silk suture.
Treatment:
Other: To Compare 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery
Suture 2: Non-absorbable polyamide monofilament.
Other group
Description:
Non-absorbable polyamide monofilament.
Treatment:
Other: To Compare 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery
Suture 3: Non-resorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.
Other group
Description:
Non-resorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.
Treatment:
Other: To Compare 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems