Comparison of Time Taken for Intubation and Cormack Lehane View Between C-Mac With Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Patients

National University of Malaysia (UKM)

Status: Completed

Conditions: Paediatric Airway

Treatments: Device: Glidescope video laryngoscopy/ C-MAC video laryngoscopy

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04145089

FF-2019-004

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study compares the time taken to intubate between Cmac video laryngoscopy with Glidescope video laryngoscopy in paediatric patients aged 3-12 years old.

Full description

This study aims to determine whether are both devices comparable to each other in terms of intubation time and Cormack Lehane view in paediatric patients with normal airway undergoing elective surgery.

Enrollment: 64 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 3 to 12 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Paediatric patients 3-12 years old undergoing elective surgery
• American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) 1-2
• No difficult airway features/history of difficult intubation
• Not obese

Exclusion criteria

• Any difficult intubation features/history of difficult intubation
• Obese child

Trial design

Primary purpose: Device Feasibility

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

64 participants in 2 patient groups

C-Mac intubation

Active Comparator group

Description:

Intubation with C-MAC video laryngoscopy

Treatment:

Device: Glidescope video laryngoscopy/ C-MAC video laryngoscopy

Glidescope intubation

Active Comparator group

Description:

Intubation with Glidescope video laryngoscopy

Treatment:

Device: Glidescope video laryngoscopy/ C-MAC video laryngoscopy