Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is now being adopted as a preferred technique for providing GA because of its various inherent advantages like reduced PONV incidence, improved quality of recovery post GA, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant action, anti-neoplastic activity, analgesic action, and absence of greenhouse effect. Over the years propofol-TIVA delivery has become more methodical due to the use of target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems. The current TCI technology has evolved with the introduction of the 'open' TCI concept wherein syringes of any configuration can be attached to the TCI-pumps having pre-programmed propofol PK-PD models. The two most commonly use propofol PK-PD models are the Marsh and Schneider models targeting the propofol blood plasma concentration and effect site concentration in the brain respectively. Automated delivery of propofol using computer-controlled closed loop anaesthesia device delivers propofol based on patient's frontal cortex electrical activity as determined by bispectral index (BIS). Evaluation of anaesthesia delivery by these systems has shown that they deliver propofol and maintain depth of anaesthesia with far more precision as compared to manual administration. A recent advance in propofol delivery has been the development of automated closed loop anaesthesia delivery system. These devices deliver propofol based on patient's frontal cortex electrical activity as determined by bispectral index (BIS).Closed loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS) is an indigenously developed continuous automated intravenous infusion system which delivers propofol based on patients' EEG profile (BIS) feedback. Currently there is no data available comparing the efficacy of TCI delivered propofol versus automated propofol delivery systems. The investigators hypothesize that automated propofol delivery by CLADS will provide more consistent anaesthesia depth maintenance as compared to TCI delivered propofol. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the efficiency of CLADS-driven propofol TIVA versus TCI administered in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery with respect to adequacy of anaesthesia depth maintenance, performance characteristic of propofol delivery system hemodynamic stability, recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative sedation.
Full description
Inhalation anaesthetic were backbone of general anaesthesia (GA) practice till the time an intravenous anaesthetic, propofol was introduced in early 1970's and its commercial availability in 1980's, which led to the resurgence in the practice of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA). TIVA is now being adopted as a preferred technique for providing GA because of scores of inherent advantages, like, reduced PONV incidence, improved quality of post-anaesthesia recovery, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant action, anti-neoplastic activity, analgesic action, and absence of greenhouse effect among many others.Over the years propofol-TIVA delivery has become more methodical and precise owing to the use of target controlled infusion (TCI) systems. TCI systems use propofol pharmacokinetic (PK) or pharmacodynamics (PD) models which predict either the plasma or the effect-site propofol concentration required for maintenance of GA steady-state during surgery. The 'Diprifusor' TCI-system was the first commercially available propofol TCI-system. The 'Diprifusor' TCI-system was a 'closed' TCI-system which required a special electronically tagged pre-filled propofol syringe to be attached to the TCI-pump. The current TCI technology has evolved with the introduction of the 'open' TCI concept wherein syringes of any configuration can be attached to the TCI-pumps having pre-programmed propofol PK-PD models. Currently, the two most commonly used PK-PD models that drive TCI systems to deliver TIVA are the 'Marsh' and 'Schneider' models. Whereas Marsh model targets blood plasma concentration of propofol for anaesthesia maintenance, the Schneider model targets effect-site concentration in the brain. A recent advance in propofol TIVA delivery has been the development of automated closed loop anaesthesia delivery system. These devices deliver propofol based ascertaining patient's frontal cortex electrical activity as determined by bispectral index (BIS) score and then keeping the values within a pre-assigned range consistent with robust GA depth. Closed loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS) is an indigenously developed patented (502/DEL/2003) computer-controlled anaesthesia delivery system. CLADS typically works with feedback loop information elicited by BIS monitoring and delivers propofol TIVA to the patient via a non-TCI automated infusion pump. This basis of CLADS is the control algorithm based on the relationship between diverse rates of propofol infusion and the processed EEG variable. Although propofol delivery by CLADS is based on pharmacokinetic model but for greater precision and efficient administration, its delivery trigger is directly linked with feedback mechanism involving patient's EEG profile as monitored by the BIS scores. In a multicentre study on evaluation of anaesthesia delivery by CLADS, it was shown that CLADS maintains depth of anaesthesia with far more precision as compared to manual administration. Queerly while TCI & CLADS technology evolved over a period of time; there is no data available comparing the efficacy of TCI delivered propofol-TIVA versus automated propofol delivery systems. Based on additional feedback loop incorporated to the PK-PD model the investigators contend that automated propofol TIVA as administered by CLADS is likely to be superior to TCI system in achieving and sustaining anaesthesia depth. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the efficacy of CLADS-driven propofol TIVA versus TCI administered propofol TIVA in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery with respect to: adequacy of anaesthesia depth maintenance (primary objective), performance characteristic of propofol delivery system, propofol requirement, hemodynamic stability, recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative sedation (secondary objectives).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
160 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Nitin Sethi, MBBS, DNB; Amitabh Dutta, MBBS, MD, PGDHR
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal