Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this [randomized clinical trial] is to evaluate the treatment outcome by assessing clinical and radiographic outcomes.
The main question it aims to answer is
Do using dental operating microscope incorperated with pulpotomy procedure will have a different outcome when compare with without using.
Participants will be asked to have clinical and radiographic evaluation for evaluating the outcome every year after treatment.
Full description
Materials and methods Study design and setting This study is a prospective, single-center, single-blinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial conducted at the Dental Department, Phaholponpayuhasena Hospital. All clinical procedures are performed by a single experienced endodontist. Clinical outcome evaluations are carried out by the same operator, while radiographic outcome evaluations are conducted by another experienced endodontist.
Study participants Inclusion Criteria
Treatment procedure A comprehensive medical and dental history is taken before treatment. Preoperative data, including age, sex, tooth number are recorded in a predesigned patient's chart. The treatment, the study design, alternative treatment modalities, potential benefits, risks, and follow-up protocol are explained to the qualifying patients and informed consent is obtained from the voluntary patients who are willing to participate in the study.
Sample size calculation The sample size calculation is based on a suspected difference of 39.2% in the success rate between the control and magnification group in MB2 orifice finding using n4Studies with a 5% α error. The minimum sample size was calculated to be 46. Considering patients lost to follow-up, a total of 50 teeth from different patients are included in this study.
Randomization and masking Block randomization with variable 4 block sizes is used to generate a sequence of random numbers for allocating the patients equally into two study groups. Each random blocks are sealed in an opaque envelope which is opened at the beginning of the clinical trial by the operator. New block will be open after all the patient in the previous block was completed and repeat until the end of the clinical trials to ensure the equality of group distribution: The vital pulp therapy with and without magnification intervention groups.
Intervention All the treatment is carried out by a single operator. All the patients received a topical anesthesia before local anesthesia. An inferior alveolar nerve block (1.8 ml 2% Lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000)+buccal infiltration (1.7 ml 4% Articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000) for mandibular teeth, buccal infiltration (1.8 ml 2% Lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000) for maxillary teeth. The anesthesia is confirmed by negative response to EPT. The pulpotomy procedure is performed under rubber dam isolation in a single visit. If the patient experienced pain during the procedure, an additional anesthesia is used to achieve profound pulpal anesthesia by intraligament injection with 0.3 ml 2% Lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000. The operating field is disinfected with iodine and alcohol. A cylindrical diamond airotor operates under air water coolant to outline the cavity. Low speed round bur and a spoon excavator are used to remove the soft carious dentine using nonselective caries removal from the periphery towards the centre of the carious lesion. The deepest layer of carious dentine is thereafter disinfected with 2 ml of 2.5% NaOCl prior to pulpal exposure.
The patient will have his or her eyes covered with a dental drape and randomly divided into the following two groups:
Group I (Magnification) : The remaining procedures will be carried on under Zeiss OPMI Pico dental operating microscope (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany) with total magnification ranging from 3.6× to 6.0×. More aspects will be included in this group which included:
Group II (Control) : The remaining procedures will be carried on under naked eye.
The new high-speed sterile diamond airotor is used to completely remove the coronal pulp tissue. Then direct passive irrigation with of 2.5% NaOCl solution up to 8 minutes to arrest the bleeding. The time to achieve hemostasis is recorded in minutes and seconds. The diagnosis of vital inflamed pulp is confirmed by the presence of bleeding in the pulp chamber.
In both study groups, 1 mm calcium silicate cement putty type (Totalfil-ERRM) is placed as a caping agent over the residual pulp.The tooth is restored with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) base (Vitrebond, 3M) and composite restoration (Z350XT, 3M) and polishing in the same visit.
The full pulpotomy cases where bleeding from residual pulp cannot be arrested within 8 minutes, are excluded from the study, and pulpectomyare performed. Immediate post-operative periapical radiograph is taken.
Treatment outcome assessment All the teeth are assessed clinically at 6 months and every year and radiographs are taken. Clinically asymptomatic teeth without any radiographic evidence of periapical rarefaction or root resorption are categorized as success in strict criteria and categorized as survival in loose criteria when clinically asymptomatic teeth with periapical rarefaction.
Recall Clinical evaluation and periapical radiograph will be taken. The quality of the coronal restoration is checked, and the restorations are repaired if deemed necessary. In case of failed cased, the cause of failure will be identified and recorded. Proper treatment will be proposed for specific problem.
Clinical evaluation included
Radiographic evaluation included
The blinded experienced endodontist will be evaluate the radiographic success of recall radiograph by recording as:
Statistical analysis The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is used to assess the normality of continuous data. Fisher's exact test analyze demographic variables. The dichotomous outcome of success versus failure will be used as the dependent variable to statistically analyze the prognostic factors. The impact of prognostic factors on treatment outcomes will be statistically analyzed using bivariate and multivariate multilevel logistic regression. Success rates between groups are analyzed using the t-test. A p-value of < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
50 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Sirawut Hiran-us, DDS, MSc, High Grad Dip, FRCDS; Choontawee Soponsakulkaew, DDS, Higher Grad Dip, FRCDS
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal