ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of Two Apical Repair Methods in Women Undergoing Repairs for Prolapse

M

Medical University of Graz

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Complication
Quality of Life
Surgery
Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Treatments

Procedure: fixation of the vaginal apex

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03113513
V4 31.01.2016

Details and patient eligibility

About

To date no study has determined prospectively which technique is superior to prevent recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) after vaginal hysterectomy- a major unmet clinical need. The aim of the study is to determine objective anatomical recurrent prolapse after Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation (SLF) vs McCall.

Full description

The aim of the study is to determine objective anatomical recurrent prolapse after SLF vs McCall. The study is designed as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Primary study endpoint will be at 12 months, secondary study endpoint at 24 months. The following parameters will be evaluated after one year: anatomical outcome, Quality of Life (QoL), sexual health, reoperations, and complications.

Enrollment

312 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

35 to 80 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • declined/ failed conservative treatment for POP
  • planned vaginal hysterectomy with anterior/posterior colporrhaphy as indicated
  • any symptomatic POP or stage II prolapse in any compartment
  • at least stage I prolapse in the apical department
  • women between 35 and 80 years of age
  • good German language skills
  • any concomitant prolapse surgery (anterior, posterior vaginal repair, suburethral tapes) as indicated
  • concomitant salpingo-oophorectomy if indicated

Exclusion criteria

  • Unwillingness to participate
  • Neurological disorders
  • Previous hysterectomy
  • Desire to have children
  • Connective tissue disorders (i.e. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Marfan syndrome)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

312 participants in 2 patient groups

McCall culdoplasty
Active Comparator group
Description:
The McCall culdoplasty will be performed in a modified version as described by McCall in 1957. Specifically, two long acting bioresorbable sutures are put through the specific anatomic landmarks.
Treatment:
Procedure: fixation of the vaginal apex
Sacrospinous ligament fixation
Active Comparator group
Description:
The SLF technique will be performed as described by Richter et al (Amreich, 1951). Two long acting bioresorbable sutures are passed through the right sacrospinous ligament and then fixed to the vaginal cuff.
Treatment:
Procedure: fixation of the vaginal apex

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Daniela Gold (prev. Ulrich), MD PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems