ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of Two Bending Angles for Nasotracheal Intubation With a Malleable Vedio Stylet

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College logo

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intubation;Difficult

Treatments

Device: bending angle

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04459481
PSH-2018-13

Details and patient eligibility

About

Video intubating stylet can be safely and effectively used for nasotracheal intubation, but the optimal bending angle is still unknown. In this study, the optimal bending angle will be determined by comparing the intubation time and success rate of nasotracheal intubation with video intubating stylet at two different bending angles.

Full description

intubation will be accomplished at 70 bending angle and 90 degrees bending angle in each group. intubation time, success rate, additional manoeuvres and epistaxis will be recorded and compared.

Enrollment

98 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 60 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients require nasotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

  • fixed, or limited, neck movement, obstructive sleep apnoea, bilateral nasal obstruction or patients with an abnormal coagulation status

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

98 participants in 2 patient groups

70-degree bending angle group
Experimental group
Description:
intubation with a 70-degree bending angle
Treatment:
Device: bending angle
90-degree bending angle group
Experimental group
Description:
intubation with a 90-degree bending angle
Treatment:
Device: bending angle

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems