ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of Two Endoscopically Placed Nasojejunal Probes

R

Ruhr University of Bochum

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Investigation Time

Treatments

Device: Freka®-Trilumina versus Freka®-EasyIn

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02705027
3967-11

Details and patient eligibility

About

A direct application of jejunal tube feeding is necessary especially in patients with gastroparesis due of existing diabetes mellitus, postoperative or severe underlying disease. Since the jejunal tube feedings, the secretion of gastric juice can be increased, the use of probes that allow both: jejunal nutrition, as well as a gastric outflow of secretions are beneficial.

While in a randomized trial of Schwab et al. it could be shown that the use of Freka-Trilumina® compared to Dobbhoff probe by so-called drag technique is significantly faster there are currently no comparative data to use the Easy-In® probe subsequently developed , which is directly introduced through the working channel of the endoscope, and thus shortening the procedure time.

Full description

The use of probes nasojejunal has increasingly become important especially in critically ill patients because of the beneficial effect in patients e.g. with necrotizing pancreatitis, according trauma or major surgical procedures.

A direct application of jejunal tube feeding is necessary especially in patients with gastroparesis due of existing diabetes mellitus, postoperative or severe underlying disease. Since the jejunal tube feedings, the secretion of gastric juice can be increased, the use of probes that allow both: jejunal nutrition, as well as a gastric outflow of secretions are beneficial.

While in a randomized trial of Schwab et al. it could be shown that the use of Freka-Trilumina® compared to Dobbhoff probe by so-called drag technique is significantly faster there are currently no comparative data to use the Easy-In® probe subsequently developed , which is directly introduced through the working channel of the endoscope, and thus shortening the procedure time.

In the presented study should be investigated to what extent the use of imported directly via the working channel Easy-Inn® probe, application time and thus the investigation period may be shortened compared to the usual nasojenunal probes.

Enrollment

64 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 90 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Clinical indication for enteral feeding via naso-jejunal probe

Exclusion criteria

  • Lack of consent of the patient or their relatives (in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care)

Trial design

64 participants in 2 patient groups

Standard
Active Comparator group
Description:
After randomization one half of the patients receive a Freka®-Trilumina probe, which is inserted in nasogastric route an then "pushed " using a small forceps which is inserted through the endoscope into the small intestine.
Treatment:
Device: Freka®-Trilumina versus Freka®-EasyIn
Freka®-EasyIn
Experimental group
Description:
The other half of the patients will receive a Freka®-EasyIn probe which is directly placed in the small intestine inserted over the endoscope, after endoscopy was initially pushed - as far as possible - into the small intestine.
Treatment:
Device: Freka®-Trilumina versus Freka®-EasyIn

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Central trial contact

Andrea Riphaus, MD, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems