Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of two different methods for fabricating and implanting Iodine-125 (^125^I) radioactive seed strands combined with a metal stent for treating malignant obstructive jaundice. The conventional method uses a straight seed strand placed between the stent and the bile duct wall. A novel technique was developed that uses a spiral-shaped seed strand placed inside the stent lumen.
Between January 2018 and February 2024, 105 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A (59 patients) received the conventional straight strand, while Group B (46 patients) received the novel spiral strand. The study compared therapeutic efficacy, the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, stent patency duration, and patient survival.
Both methods successfully improved liver function. However, the novel spiral technique (Group B) caused significantly fewer complications, such as bile leakage and peritonitis, compared to the conventional method (Group A). Importantly, patients in Group B also had longer stent patency (305 days vs. 277 days) and longer overall survival (345 days vs. 300 days).
In conclusion, the novel spiral seed strand implantation technique is a safer and more effective treatment option for malignant obstructive jaundice.
Full description
Malignant obstructive jaundice often requires palliative drainage with self-expanding metallic stents. Combining stents with brachytherapy using Iodine-125 (^125^I) seed strands has been shown to prolong stent patency and patient survival compared to stenting alone. The conventional technique implants a linear seed strand between the stent and the bile duct wall, which is associated with risks of hemobilia, biliary fistula, and peritonitis due to the need for a larger puncture tract. This prospective, randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate a novel, refined method involving a spiral-configured ^125^I seed strand implanted within the stent lumen, hypothesizing that it would reduce procedure-related complications while maintaining or improving therapeutic efficacy.
Study Design and Methods:
This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial. From January 2018 to February 2024, 105 patients with inoperable malignant obstructive jaundice were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups.
Group A (Conventional, n=59): Received a straight ^125^I seed strand implanted between the metallic stent and the bile duct wall.
Group B (Novel, n=46): Received a spiral ^125^I seed strand implanted within the lumen of the metallic stent.
All patients first underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for decompression, followed by the combined stent and seed strand (PTBSIS) procedure 3-7 days later.
Primary and Secondary Outcomes:
The primary endpoints were procedure-related complications (intraoperative and postoperative) and stent patency time. Secondary endpoints included technical success rate, improvement in liver function tests at one month, and overall patient survival. Complications assessed included nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain, hemobilia, vagal reflex, fever, biliary fistula, and biliary peritonitis.
Statistical Analysis:
Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Stent patency and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. A two-sided P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients with a definitive diagnosis of Malignant Obstructive Jaundice (MOJ) confirmed by imaging (enhanced CT/MRCP), laboratory tests, and/or pathology.
2. Assessed by a multidisciplinary team as not a candidate for curative surgical resection.
3. No absolute contraindications for the combined implantation of a biliary metallic stent and an ^125^I seeds strand (e.g., severe coagulation dysfunction, significant renal impairment, or uncontrolled serious cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases).
4. Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
105 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal