Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study is designed to compare the short-term effects of two different thoracic spine thrust manipulation techniques on neck range-of-motion, pain, and self-reported disability in people with neck pain.
The null hypothesis is that there will be no differences between the two manipulation techniques for short-term effects on neck range-of-motion, pain, and self-reported disability in people with neck pain.
Full description
Patients will be involved in the study over a 4 week period. Each participant will be asked to attend 4 sessions, with one week in between each session as follows: Week 0 = baseline assessment and treatment 1; Week 1= treatment 2; Week 2 = treatment 3; and week 4 = follow-up assessment.
Patients who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to either a supine or prone thoracic spine thrust manipulation intervention.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Neck pain related to a motor vehicle accident or other trauma within the previous 6 weeks
Neck pain that spreads down into both arms
Low back pain or thoracic origin of pain
Nerve root involvement; defined as the presence of two or more neurological findings (e.g. decreased strength, diminished deep tendon reflex, or decreased sensation) at the same nerve root level
Diagnosis of cervical spine stenosis (narrowing of the central canal that contains the spinal cord)
History of spinal tumors, spinal infection, cervical spine fracture, or previous neck surgery
Pending legal action related to current episode of neck pain
Contraindications to thoracic spine thrust manipulation
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
21 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal