ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV Placement With and Without Use of a Guidewire

Mass General Brigham logo

Mass General Brigham

Status

Completed

Conditions

Difficult Peripheral IV Access

Treatments

Device: Ultrasound guided peripheral IV placement

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02422472
2015P000073

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to compare ultrasound guided peripheral IV placement with and without the use of a guidewire. Patients in the Emergency Department with difficult peripheral IV access (as defined by 2 failed attempts by nursing staff) will be consented and randomized to standard ultrasound guided peripheral IV placement or ultrasound guided peripheral IV placement with modified seldinger technique using a guidewire.

Enrollment

70 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Difficult peripheral IV access (2 failed attempts by nursing staff)
  • Prior history of difficult IV access and patient request for ultrasound guided IV

Exclusion criteria

  • Need for emergent access or central venous access
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

70 participants in 2 patient groups

Standard
No Intervention group
Description:
Standard of care ultrasound guided peripheral IV placement
Experimental
Experimental group
Description:
Ultrasound guided peripheral IV placement with the use of a guidewire
Treatment:
Device: Ultrasound guided peripheral IV placement

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems