ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Radiography for Diagnosis of Nasal Fractures

K

Klinikum der Universitaet Muenchen, Grosshadern

Status

Completed

Conditions

Nasal Fracture

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT00650650
NF-US-XR-05

Details and patient eligibility

About

The standard imaging procedure to diagnose a nasal fracture still is radiography (lateral nasal view and occipitomental view). But technological advances in ultrasonography during the last few decades have made high-resolution ultrasound devices available to the majority of medical centers. It has been shown that the bony structures of the nose can be well examined by ultrasound in the last few years. The hypothesis: "Is ultrasound of equal diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing nasal fractures as radiography" is being tested in the investigators' study. Patients with suspected nasal fracture undergo ultrasound examination in addition to the routine x-ray imaging. After completion of treatment, the readings of both ultrasound and radiographs are compared in terms of sensitivity and specificity to diagnose nasal fractures.

Enrollment

80 estimated patients

Sex

All

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • suspected nasal fracture

Exclusion criteria

  • further fractures
  • pregnancy
  • unstable condition
  • refusal to undergo ultrasound examination

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems