Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This randomized study aims to compare the efficacy and hemodynamic effects of hypobaric unilateral spinal anesthesia (HUSA) and lumbar plexus block (LP-SP) in patients undergoing femoral neck fracture surgery. Conducted at a single center, the study includes 60 patients aged 18 to 90, classified as ASA I-IV, and evaluates anesthesia methods' impact on intraoperative parameters, including blood pressure, sedation needs, and recovery outcomes. The findings will inform anesthetic strategy selection based on patient characteristics and surgical requirements.
Full description
This prospective, randomized, controlled study is designed to compare hypobaric unilateral spinal anesthesia (HUSA) and lumbar plexus block combined with sacral plexus block (LP-SP) in patients undergoing femoral neck fracture surgery. The study will be conducted at Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital and will include a total of 60 patients aged between 18 and 90 years with ASA physical status I-IV.
Eligible patients will be randomized into two groups: the HUSA group and the LP-SP group. In the HUSA group, unilateral spinal anesthesia will be performed using 5 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine diluted with distilled water to achieve a hypobaric solution. In the LP-SP group, lumbar plexus block and sacral plexus block will be performed using ultrasound-guided Shamrock or paramedian sagittal approaches with 0.5% bupivacaine.
Standard intraoperative monitoring will be applied to all patients, including electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, and anesthesia depth monitoring with entropy and surgical pleth index. Intraoperative sedation, vasopressor use, and intravenous fluid administration will be managed according to institutional clinical protocols and patient needs.
Hemodynamic parameters, anesthesia depth indices, nociception indices, sedation requirements, and recovery-related parameters will be recorded intraoperatively at predefined time points. All data will be collected prospectively and analyzed to compare the two anesthetic techniques in terms of intraoperative stability and perioperative management requirements.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
50 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal