ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of US-Guided Paravertebral and Proximal Intercostal Nerve Blocks

Mass General Brigham logo

Mass General Brigham

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Pain

Treatments

Procedure: Paravertebral Block
Procedure: Proximal Intercostal Block

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02911168
2016P000174/MGH

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to compare the proximal intercostal block to the more medial (classic) ultrasound-guided paravertebral block. The investigators hypothesize that the proximal intercostal block will allow for improved needle visualization, shorter block time, and improved safety profile compared to the classic paravertebral bock.

Full description

Although previous studies have made advances towards applying ultrasound guidance to the performance of paravertebral blocks (PVB), a technique combining both safety and technical ease remains elusive. The ideal technique (1) permits continuous visualization of the entire needle shaft and tip, (2) avoids aiming the needle tip and injectate directly toward the neuraxis or lung, and (3) is easy to perform. Visualization of all structures by ultrasound is essential to minimize the risk of vascular puncture, nerve root or spinal cord injury, and pneumothorax. Failure to consistently and quickly identify the transverse process and pleura, as occurs when using older techniques, results in several needle redirections, causing pain and discomfort to patients, and increases the potential risk of pneumothorax. The technical difficulty of applying previously-described US-guided techniques takes an inordinate amount of time and is clinically less practical within a busy surgical practice.

In the current study, the investigators describe a novel, modified approach to real-time ultrasound-guided single shot paravertebral blockade, the proximal intercostal block (PICB), which utilizes a sagittal paramedian US probe placement to identify the intercostal space and PVS. In this method, instead of placing the probe at a fixed traditional distance of 2.5 cm from the spinous processes, the probe is moved laterally to obtain a comprehensive image, with a clear view of the ribs, internal intercostal membrane, and the parietal pleura.

The investigators propose that moving the probe laterally towards the proximal intercostal space allows clearer simultaneous visualization of both pleura and needle as it advances towards the PVS, while achieving comparable injectate spread and, ultimately, similar or better clinical results. Such improved visualization will reduce the number of needle passes, increase confidence in the user, decrease block placement time, and improve overall block success. This technique combines the advantages of more lateral approaches (better visualization of structures, in particular the pleura) with the advantage of the more medial approaches (in-plane, closer, and not directed at the neuraxis).

Enrollment

48 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 85 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Females age 18-85 years old
  2. ASA 1-3
  3. Patient scheduled for unilateral or bilateral mastectomy with or without reconstruction

Exclusion criteria

  1. Coagulopathy
  2. Patient refusal
  3. Allergy to local anesthetics

Trial design

Primary purpose

Basic Science

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

48 participants in 2 patient groups

Proximal Intercostal Block
Active Comparator group
Description:
See Intervention Section
Treatment:
Procedure: Proximal Intercostal Block
Paravertebral Block
Active Comparator group
Description:
See Intervention Section
Treatment:
Procedure: Paravertebral Block

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Avery Williams-Vafai, MD; Kamen Vlassakov, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems