Comparison Of Videolaryngoscopes In Double Lumen Tube (D&Xblade)

Inonu University

Status: Unknown

Conditions: One-lung Ventilation; Videolaryngoscopy; Double Lumen Tube

Treatments: Device: C-MAC Videolaryngoscope D blade; Device: McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope X3 blade

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03826706

Asozkan 4

Details and patient eligibility

About

Along with the technological advances in medicine, videolaryngoscope is the most commonly preferred technique for intubation with double lumen tube. The use of Storz C-MAC D Blade and McGrath MAC X3 Blade videolaryngoscope were compared in intubation of single lung ventilation patients who underwent chest surgery in terms of duration of intubation, hemodynamic response and intubation-induced complications.

Full description

It is very important for anesthesiologists to evaluate and make the airway safe in order to start and continue surgical operations. Endotracheal intubation has many important reasons such as ensuring airway control safely during surgical procedure, increasing the depth of anesthesia, need interventions for surgical or anesthetic complications, reduction of dead space, reduction of respiratory effort and prevention of aspiration risk. Videolaryngoscope, developed in recent years and beginning to take place in the algorithms, facilitate difficult airway management and hence intubation.

The use of videolaryngoscope in patients with intubation such as double lumen tube, has been frequently reported in the literature. McGrath videolaryngoscope has a high-resolution video camera, a length-adjustable angle blade, and a light source at the tip of the blade. At the same time, the C-MAC videolaryngoscope is another advanced videolaryngoscope with a better quality video and camera system and improves the performance of videolaryngoscope with some technological changes. In this prospective controlled clinical study, the purpose is to compare C-MAC videolaryngoscope with D blade and McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope with X3 blade in respect to duration of intubation, haemodynamic response, and adverse events associated with intubation of patients undergoing lung surgery.

Enrollment: 50 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 65 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• American Society of Anesthesiology score III,
• 18-65 years,
• BMI> 40
• Patients who was intubated with double lumen tube.

Exclusion criteria

• American Society of Anesthesiology IV,
• Under 18 years,
• Over 65 years,
• Under BMI<40
• Obstetric patients,
• Uncontrolled cerebrovascular disease,
• Patients who refused written informed consent forms

Trial design

Primary purpose: Screening

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

50 participants in 2 patient groups

C-MAC Videolaryngoscope D blade

Active Comparator group

Description:

Patients was intubated with C-MAC videolaryngoscope D blade.

Treatment:

Device: C-MAC Videolaryngoscope D blade

Device: McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope X3 blade

McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope X3 blade

Active Comparator group

Description:

Patients was intubated with McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope X3 blade

Treatment:

Device: C-MAC Videolaryngoscope D blade

Device: McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope X3 blade