ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparisons Between Low Thoracic and Lumbar Epidural Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Low Thoracic v.s. Lumbar Epidural for Post-cesarean Pain

National Taiwan University logo

National Taiwan University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Post-cesarean Pain Control Quality

Treatments

Procedure: low thoracic epidural
Procedure: lumbar epidural

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03946982
201902009RINC

Details and patient eligibility

About

Whether low thoracic epidural analgesia improves postoperative cesarean pain qualities than conventional lumbar epidural analgesia?

Full description

Postoperative pain remains the leading cause of concern in women faced with undergoing a cesarean delivery. Inadequate acute pain management is associated with numerous negative effects, including delayed postpartum recovery, interference with mother-child bonding because postoperative pain limits breastfeeding, and a high risk of postpartum depression and persistent pain.

Epidural analgesia (EA) is being increasingly preferred to systemic opioid because of better analgesic effect. Although EA is widely used for cesarean delivery, the effect of the site of epidural catheter insertion on the quality of postoperative pain management remains inadequately investigated. For example, placement of the epidural catheter in the low thoracic intervertebral spaces may be more suitable for catheter-incision-congruent analgesia during caesarean delivery than in the lumbar intervertebral space; however, epidural catheter insertion is conventionally recommended at the lumbar intervertebral space. Therefore, in this study, we aim to investigate the difference in post-cesarean pain control quality between low thoracic EA and lumbar EA.

Enrollment

189 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

20 to 50 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion:

  1. age between 20-yr and 50-yr parturients
  2. elective cesarean delivery

Exclusion:

  1. contraindicated to regional anesthesia, eg. coagulopathy (INR> 1.5; platelet< 80000...etc)
  2. significant co-morbidities, eg. preeclamspia, heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification> class 2
  3. allergy to opioids or local anesthetics

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

189 participants in 4 patient groups

Low thoracic patient controlled epidural analgesia
Experimental group
Treatment:
Procedure: low thoracic epidural
Lumbar epidural patient controlled epidural analgesia
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Procedure: lumbar epidural
Low thoracic epidural morphine
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Procedure: low thoracic epidural
Lumbar epidural morphine
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Procedure: lumbar epidural

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems