Computer Guided Versus Freehand Dental Implant Surgery (dental implant)

O

October 6 University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Dental Implant

Treatments

Procedure: dental implant

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06204692
October6U (Other Identifier)
RECO6U/29-2022

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study's goal is to evaluate the efficacy of traditional rehabilitation with freehand implant implantation of partly or totally edentulous patients utilizing flapless or mini-flap procedures vs. 3D implant design software and specialized surgical templates.

Full description

Patients with at least 7 mm of height and 4 mm of breadth in their bones, who needed at least two implants to be restored with a single prosthesis, were recruited one after the other. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups in a parallel group trial design. : Group I: consisted of 6 patients where computer guided dental implant placement and Group II: included six people who had dental implants placed manually. A temporary prosthesis was inserted into the implants right away, and four to six months later, a permanent prosthesis took its place. Implant failures, marginal bone loss, number of therapy sessions, length of treatment, post-surgical pain and swelling, use of painkillers, surgical time, time needed to resolve problems, and patient satisfaction were among the outcome variables evaluated by a blinded, independent assessor. Patients were tracked for a full year.

Enrollment

12 patients

Sex

All

Ages

40 to 65 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • totally edentulous in one or both arches,
  • with at least 7 mm of height and 4 mm of breadth in their bones as assessed by preoperative CBCT scans.
  • patients between the ages of 35 and 65 who could give informed permission,
  • Implants next to each other required to be positioned at least 3 mm apart from each other and 1.5 mm apart from the tooth.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who have received radiation therapy to the head and neck region within the year prior to implantation,
  • those who are receiving intravenous amino bisphosphonates,
  • those who have untreated periodontitis,
  • those with uncontrolled diabetes,
  • pregnant women, or nursing mothers are among the general contraindications to implant surgery.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

12 participants in 1 patient group

Computer Guided Dental Implant Surgery.
Other group
Description:
Computer Guided Dental Implant Surgery
Treatment:
Procedure: dental implant

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems