Conscious Sedation With Suprainguinal Facia Iliaca Block Versus Ilioinguinal Iliohypogastric Block for TAVI

Ain Shams University

Status: Invitation-only

Conditions: Aortic Stenosis

Treatments: Other: Local infiltration; Other: suprainguinal fascia iliaca block group (SIFIB); Other: iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal group (IL-IH)

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06911463

FMASU R30/2024/2025

Details and patient eligibility

About

the aim of the present study is to compare suprainguinal fascia iliaca block and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric (II-IH) nerve block in improving the quality of conscious sedation, including reducing patients' requirements for analgesia also better satisfaction for both patient and surgeon as regards patient outcome and decreasing the incidence of conversion to general anesthesia during TAVI procedure

Enrollment: 45 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 20+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• aged >20 years with severe aortic stenosis undergoing elective, non-emergent, non-urgent transfemoral Sapien 3TM (Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Irvine, CA, USA) or CoreValveTM (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) implantation were included in the study

Exclusion criteria

• younger than 20 years

Trial design

Primary purpose: Other

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

45 participants in 3 patient groups

Group I (F)

Active Comparator group

Description:

suprainguinal fascia iliaca block group (SIFIB)

Treatment:

Other: suprainguinal fascia iliaca block group (SIFIB)

Group II (I)

Active Comparator group

Description:

iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal group (IL-IH)

Treatment:

Other: iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal group (IL-IH)

Group III (C)

Other group

Description:

control group patients received infiltration of 0.5% 10ml bupivacaine and 1% 10 ml lidocaine in the groin at the site of puncture

Treatment:

Other: Local infiltration