Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Retrospective observational study in a random selection of 5% of digital records active between 2014 and 2017 to quantify the frequency of Do not do primary care recommendations, calculating the over-cost related to them and study reviewing a random selection of cases previously identified to determine whether patient suffered adverse events and their over-cost.
Full description
Basement: Overuse subjected patients to unnecessary risk without promoting a sufficient clinical benefit and over-cost. The Less is More Medicine movement has led to the identification of Do not do in different specialties, also in primary care.
Objective: To analyze the impact of errors (overuse rates based in Do not do recommendations) in clinical practice.
Method: Retrospective observational study in a random selection of 5% of digital records active between 2014 and 2017 to quantify the frequency of Do not do primary care recommendations, calculating the over-cost related to them. Retrospective study reviewing a random selection of cases previously identified to determine whether patient suffered adverse events and their over-cost.
Setting. Primary care in Andalucía, Aragón, Castilla La Mancha, Comunidad Valenciana, Madrid, Murcia, Navarra y País Vasco, eight autonomous communities in Spain.
Enrollment
Sex
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
750,000 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal