Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
To achieve an optimal contact area is essential to avoid tooth migration, food impaction, and the occurrence of secondary caries. However, proximal restorations constitute challenge for the professional and tight contact points are difficult to obtain depending not only on tools used, but also on type of restorative material. Current tooth-colored restorative materials are not condensable and there is shrinkage with setting. The aim of this study is to compare the proximal contact tightness of zirconia reinforced glass ionomer versus conventional nanohybrid resin composite when used in class II cavities.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Eligibility Criteria of participants:
Inclusion Criteria of participants:
Exclusion criteria of participants:
Pregnancy.
Disabilities.
Systemic disease or severe medical complications.
Allergic history concerning methacrylate.
Rampant caries.
Heavy smoking.
Xerostomia.
Lack of compliance.
Evidence of severe bruxism, clenching, or temporomandibular joint disorders.
b- Eligibility Criteria of teeth:
Inclusion Criteria of teeth:
Exclusion criteria of the teeth:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
52 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal