Continuous Chest Compressions vs AHA Standard CPR of 30:2 (CCC)

University of Washington

Status and phase: Completed; Phase 4

Conditions: Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Treatments: Other: Standard CPR; Other: Continuous chest compressions

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other; Other U.S. Federal agency; Industry; NIH

Identifiers

NCT01372748

5U01HL077863-07 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

40404-B

Details and patient eligibility

About

The primary aim of the trial is to compare survival to hospital discharge after continuous chest compressions (CCC) versus standard American Heart Association (AHA) recommended cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with interrupted chest compressions (ICC) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA). The primary null hypothesis will be that the rate of survival to hospital discharge is not affected by use of continuous compressions with passive or positive pressure ventilation (intervention group) versus CPR with compressions interrupted for ventilation at a ratio of 30:2 (control group).

Full description

The primary aim of the trial is to compare survival to hospital discharge after continuous chest compressions (CCC) versus standard American Heart Association (AHA) recommended cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with interrupted chest compressions (ICC) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA). For this study, CCC consists of a series of three cycles of continuous chest compressions without pauses for ventilation followed by rhythm analysis or until restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), whichever occurs first. ICC consists of series of three cycles of standard CPR each cycle comprised of chest compressions with interposed ventilations at a compression:ventilation ratio of 30:2 (per AHA guidelines) followed by rhythm analysis or until ROSC, whichever occurs first. In either patient group, the duration of manual CPR before the first rhythm analysis will be 30 seconds or 120 seconds. This treatment period will be followed by two cycles of compressions then rhythm analysis (i.e. each of approximately 2 minutes duration) in either group. Other aims of the trial are to compare survival to discharge among patients grouped by first-recorded rhythm or other a priori subgroups, as well as to compare neurological status at discharge, mechanistic outcomes or adverse events between control and intervention groups.

Enrollment: 23,711 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Age 18 years or more (or local age of consent);
• Initial fire/Emergency Medical Services (EMS) chest compressions provided by Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) study participating agency dispatched to the scene;
• Lack of the exclusion criteria below

Exclusion criteria

• EMS witnessed arrest;
• Written do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) orders;
• Obvious primary asphyxia or respiratory cause of arrest (drowning, strangulation, hanging)
• Advanced airway placed prior to ROC EMS arrival, or pre-existing tracheostomy
• Traumatic cause (blunt, penetrating, burn) of arrest;
• Known prisoners;
• Known pregnancy;
• Uncontrolled bleeding or exsanguination
• Mechanical compression device used during study-assigned compression cycles

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Crossover Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

23,711 participants in 2 patient groups

Standard CPR

Active Comparator group

Description:

American Heart Association (AHA)recommended cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) of 30 compressions with brief pause for 2 ventilations

Treatment:

Other: Standard CPR

Continuous chest compressions

Experimental group

Description:

Continuous compression CPR

Treatment:

Other: Continuous chest compressions