ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Continuous Preperitoneal Infusion of Local Anesthetic (CPA) Versus Epidural Infusion of Local Anesthetic (EA) in Fast-Track Open Colorectal Surgery

U

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Status and phase

Unknown
Phase 4

Conditions

Open Colorectal Surgery
Early Rehabilitation After Surgery

Treatments

Other: Multilobed catheter (group EA)
Other: Multilobed catheter (group CPA)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT00915265
CHU-0052

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to compare the continuous preperitoneal infusion of local anesthetic and continuous epidural analgesia for postoperative pain management in fast-track open colorectal surgery.

Full description

Optimized pain relief allowing early mobilization is a prerequisite for enhanced recovery after surgery. Open colorectal surgery is associated with severe and prolonged postoperative pain, especially during mobilization. No analgesic technique has fulfilled all requirements of optimal efficacy: no side effects, low costs, high patient compliance, and improvement in outcome, and consequently, multimodal analgesic techniques have been introduced with a focus on opioid sparing to improve analgesia and recovery. Epidural analgesia (EA) has shown a marked benefit in controlling pain at mobilization, and significantly improves pain management when compared with systemic patient-controlled morphine analgesia. However, eligible patients may not benefit from it because of technical problems or failure of efficiency. Recently, continuous preperitoneal infusion of local anesthetic (CPA) has been shown to be an effective method to relief pain after open colorectal surgery, to reduced morphine consumption and accelerated postoperative recovery. However, this technique has never been evaluated in a fast-track program (ERAS protocol). Moreover, continuous preperitoneal infusions of local anesthetic and epidural analgesia have never been compared.

The purpose of this randomized and double-blinded study is to compare these two techniques on pain control during mobilization, as a prerequisite for enhanced recovery after open colorectal surgery: 1- CPA group: continuous preperitoneal administration of 0.2% ropivacaine using a multilobed catheter positioned between the previously closed parietal peritoneum and the underside of the transversalis fascia + intravenous morphine (patient-controlled analgesia, PCA) as a rescue; 2- EA group: epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine (patient-controlled epidural analgesia, PCEA) + continuous preperitoneal administration of 0.9% saline.

Enrollment

100 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • Open colorectal surgery through a midline incision with a primary anastomosis
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III

Exclusion criteria

  • Obesity (body mass index > 35 kg/m2)
  • Pregnancy
  • Inflammatory bowel diseases
  • Contraindication for epidural analgesia (patient refusal, active sepsis, coagulopathy)
  • Chronic renal failure (with creatinin clearance < 30 ml/min)
  • Significant hepatic failure (prothrombin ratio < 50%, factor V < 50%)
  • Chronic pain
  • Preoperative opioid consumption
  • Preoperative cognitive dysfunction
  • Preoperative psychiatric disorders

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Patrick Lacarin

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems