Conventional Double-lumen Tube vs VivaSight DL

Medical University of Warsaw

Status: Completed

Conditions: Endotracheal Intubation

Treatments: Device: VivaSight DL; Device: conventional double-lumen tube

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT02741921

02/04/2016

Details and patient eligibility

About

The investigators sought to compare the time to intubation and success rate of the endotracheal intubation using standard double-lumen tube and video tube ETView DL in an adult cadaver model in normal and difficult airway conditions.

Enrollment: 27 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• fresh adult cadavers

Exclusion criteria

• cadavers with face injures

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Crossover Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

27 participants in 2 patient groups

Normal airway

Experimental group

Description:

intubation with normal airway Cormack-Lehane classivication I

Treatment:

Device: conventional double-lumen tube

Device: VivaSight DL

difficult airway

Experimental group

Description:

intubation with difficult airway Cormack-Lehane classivication III

Treatment:

Device: conventional double-lumen tube

Device: VivaSight DL