Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
This clinical study compared a conventional surgical technique (CST) and a minimally invasive surgical technique (MIST) in the regenerative treatment of mandibular furcation defects.
Full description
Using a split-mouth design, fifteen patients with bilateral class II and III furcation defects were treated with MIST (Test Group) or CST (Control Group). Furcation defects in both groups were filled with anorganic bovine bone (ABB) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD). Patient-centered outcomes including analyses of pain, discomfort, edema, hematoma, root hypersensitivity and daily activities interference were recorded using a Visual Analogue Scale seven days after surgeries. Clinical and radiographic parameters were assessed at baseline and 6 months postoperatively. Data were statistically analysed.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
(I) subjects with a diagnosis of periodontitis; (II) presence of one pair of contralateral mandibular molars with buccal / lingual furcation defects; (III) non-smokers; (IV) plaque index < 20%.
Exclusion criteria
(I) patients that presented systemic disease; (II) had taken antibiotics in the past 6 months prior to surgery; (III) pregnant women or lactating mothers; (IV) molars with periapical disease; (V) cervical restorations or prosthesis closer than 1 mm to fornix; (VI) lingual furcation defects presenting gingival recession (GR)
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
15 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal