Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency of conversion to IUI and IVF in patients with a poor ovarian response to stimulation
Full description
In 5 to 10% of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, a poor response to ovarian stimulation (defined as less than 4 mature follicles) is noted, even though high doses of exogenous gonadotropins are used. To date, there is no consensus on the ideal management strategy in poor responders. There are three therapeutic options available nowadays:
If live birth rates were comparable between IUI and IVF, conversion to IUI would be the better option for poor responders, since it would avoid an invasive procedure (oocyte retrieval) and the associated risk of complications, and is associated with at a lower cost.
To our knowledge, no prospective randomized controlled trial comparing IVF to conversion to IUI in poor responders has been published to date. The studies published so far have been retrospective and observational, and had several methodological flaws.
Therefore, we aimed to analyze whether conversion of IVF cycles to IUI in poor responders would result in the same live birth rates as oocyte retrievals followed by embryo transfers.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Patients who accepted being included and signed the consent forms.
Age ≥18 years et <43 years.
IVF cycle with and without Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI):
Exclusion criteria
Confirmed bilateral tubal occlusion
Non-French speaking patients
Partners with severe oligoasthenoteratospermia (OATS) (<5 millions motile spermatozoa in the ejaculate)
Suboptimal stimulation protocols:
Women under legal guardianship
Women with no health or social security coverage
Women participating in other interventional trials
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
462 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Pierre-Emmanuel BOUET, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal