ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Conversion of Maintenance Prograf to Envarsus in Liver Transplant Recipients

University Health Network, Toronto logo

University Health Network, Toronto

Status and phase

Invitation-only
Phase 4

Conditions

Immune System Suppression
Liver Transplant Rejection

Treatments

Drug: Prograf
Drug: Envarsus

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05655273
22-5210

Details and patient eligibility

About

Prograf and Envarsus are two different formulations of Tacrolimus which is used as an immunosuppressant in liver transplant (LT) patients. Prograf is currently used as part of the standard immunosuppression regimen for LT recipients at UHN. This study will compare the use of Prograf and Envarsus and their effects on liver and renal function, trough tacrolimus levels, drug-related adverse effects, and patient adherence. Trial design is a pilot randomized trial. The study aims to recruit 40 patients from UHN's LT program and they will be randomized 1:1 to either stay on their current dose of Prograf or be converted to a once-daily equivalent dose of Envarsus. Both groups of patients will be followed for 48 weeks. This study will compare the change from baseline to week 48 in liver and renal function, tacrolimus-related side effects and patient reported outcomes between the two study groups.

Full description

Tacrolimus (Prograf ©) has become part of the standard of care for patients receiving solid organ transplants and is part of the immunosuppressive protocol (along with prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil [CellCept ©]) used by liver transplant recipients at University Health Network (UHN). Tacrolimus is associated with several toxicities including renal injury, tremor, pancreatic islet β-cell injury (leading to diabetes) and hyperlipidemia. As a result of these potential toxicities, careful therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus is a key component of post-transplant management. Tacrolimus trough levels are known to correlate with total tacrolimus exposure, as shown from formal pharmacokinetic assessments. Accordingly, trough serum concentrations of tacrolimus are measured routinely in all recipients and are used to guide dosing. The Prograf formulation of tacrolimus has a short serum half-life and must be dosed twice daily to maintain therapeutic serum concentrations. Further, Prograf administration results in a high peak tacrolimus level. Peak tacrolimus levels have been shown to correlate with toxicity; thus, avoidance of high peaks may be desirable to minimize tacrolimus toxicity.

Envarsus is an extended-release formulation of tacrolimus that provides similar drug exposure to tacrolimus at a 30% lower dose but with a once daily dosing regimen. Envarsus dosing also results in a lower peak tacrolimus level compared to Prograf. In this way, it is hoped that Envarsus may provide similar therapeutic efficacy as Prograf but with fewer adverse effects. In addition, the simpler dosing regimen is expected to enhance patient adherence and quality of life.

The present study is aimed at evaluating the impact of a switch from Prograf to Envarsus on liver and renal function, trough tacrolimus levels, drug-related adverse effects and adherence. It hypothesizes that once daily Envarsus can be substituted at reduced daily dose for twice daily Prograf in stable liver transplant recipients without clinically meaningful changes in liver allograft function while reducing tacrolimus side effects, reducing cumulative daily dose of the drug and increasing adherence to treatment and quality of life.The results of this study have the potential to change current practice. Trial design is a pilot randomized trial. The study aims to recruit 40 patients from UHN's LT program and they will be randomized 1:1 to either stay on their current dose of Prograf or be converted to a once-daily equivalent dose of Envarsus. Both groups of patients will be followed for 48 weeks. This study will compare the change from baseline to week 48 in liver and renal function, tacrolimus-related side effects and patient reported outcomes between the two study groups.

Enrollment

40 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 99 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult (>18 years) prevalent liver transplant recipient
  • >12 months after liver transplant
  • Prograf-based maintenance immunosuppression with targeted tacrolimus trough level of 5-10 ug/L
  • Stable liver allograft function (defined as ASL & ALT <30, Bilirubin <20 & ALP<150 at baseline visit or within 4 weeks of baseline visit)
  • Stable renal function (creatinine < 180 µmol/l and eGFR > 40 ml/min) at baseline visit (or within 4 weeks of baseline visit)
  • No episode of acute rejection within 6 months of baseline visit
  • Elevated creatinine (defined as >ULN) OR Significant symptoms (by patient self-report) potentially associated with tacrolimus (eg. tremor, difficulty to concentrate, insomnia) OR difficulty to adhere to a twice daily regimen

Exclusion criteria

  • Multiorgan transplant;
  • severe intercurrent illness;
  • severe cognitive impairment (all as determined by clinical team);
  • unwilling to consent.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

40 participants in 2 patient groups

Post-liver transplant patients receiving Prograf
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Drug: Prograf
Post-liver transplant patients receiving Envarsus
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Drug: Envarsus

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Erin Winter, BSC

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems