Cost Efficacy Evaluation of Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (ROBOTCAP)
Status
Conditions
Treatments
Details and patient eligibility
About
In this observational cost efficacy study, the investigator compare the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP). Every cost of care that include hospitalization related or post operative medical consumption are obtained and recorded up to 5 years follow up. Functional results (continence, potency, quality of life) are obtained through standardised questionnaires. Carcinologic results are estimated by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) relapse and salvage treatments. Economic evaluation will be made to estimate direct costs of the four postoperative year along with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per successful surgical treatment (preserved urinary continence and erectile function and PSA < 0.2).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
- Localized prostate cancer
- Gleason grade ≤ 3 + 4
- PSA < 15 ng / mL
- Stage ≤ T2b
- Eligible to receive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
- Candidate bilateral or unilateral erectile preservation
Exclusion criteria
- Patient at high risk of postoperative progression (PSA> 15 ng / mL; grade 5 predominant, clinical or radiological stage T3
- Presenting erectile dysfunction (IIEF < 22)
- Past history of urinary incontinence (> grade 1 WHO)
- Body mass index > 30
Trial design
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
25 participants in 2 patient groups
Trial contacts and locations
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal