ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Crestal Bone Response to Narrow vs. Regular Tie-Base in Subcrestal Implants

M

Menoufia University

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Bone Loss

Treatments

Device: Intervention Name (Arm 1): Narrow tie-base abutment Intervention Name (Arm 2): Regular tie-base abutment

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07196228
ADMNF-00425

Details and patient eligibility

About

This 24-month randomized clinical trial evaluates peri-implant marginal bone changes at subcrestal implants restored with narrow versus regular tie-base abutments.

The study investigates whether narrow or regular tie-base abutments influence peri-implant crestal bone remodeling over 24 months.

This trial assesses the effect of abutment diameter (narrow vs. regular tie-base) on marginal bone stability at subcrestal implants after 24 months.

We aimed to determine if abutment diameter impacts peri-implant marginal bone levels by comparing narrow and regular tie-base abutments in a 24-month RCT.

Full description

INTRODUCTION The preservation of supracrestal peri- implant soft tissues plays a crucial role in maintaining bone tissue stability.(1) In recent decades, it has been suggested that peri- implant marginal bone loss is influenced by several factors, including the surface characteristics of the implant neck, the implant- abutment, abutment height, platform switching, and abutment dis/reconnection.(2) Limiting these disconnections has been shown to improve the maintenance of the peri- implant marginal bone level.

On the other hand, it has been observed that transmucosal abutments with convex designs can influence bone remodeling, even with platform switching, when compared to straight or concave abutments.(3,4) The hypothesis was that distancing the abutment- prosthesis interface from the implant shoulder and using narrower transmucosal abutments with platform switching could favor the maintenance of the peri- implant marginal bone level by reducing bone remodeling and the apical migration of the "biological width".

Although there is evidence regarding the influence of platform switching or abutment height on the maintenance of the peri- implant marginal bone level, the evidence on the effect of abutment diameter is limited.(5,6) Therefore, the aim of this 24- month randomized clinical trial is to evaluate changes in the peri- implant marginal bone level at implants restored narrow or regular tie-base after 24 months.

Enrollment

40 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 70 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

**Inclusion Criteria

Adults ≥18 years old.

Single missing tooth in a posterior quadrant, bordered by adjacent natural teeth.

Adequate bone volume to place implants 8.5-10 mm in length and 4 mm in diameter without the need for bone or soft tissue grafting.

Presence of a natural tooth or an implant-supported fixed restoration as an antagonist.

Good oral hygiene with a plaque index <25%.

Willing and able to comply with study procedures and follow-up schedule.

Provided written informed consent.

**Exclusion Criteria

Systemic conditions or medications affecting bone metabolism (e.g., bisphosphonates, corticosteroids).

Untreated periodontitis, persistent oral infections, or poor oral hygiene.

Metabolic bone diseases (e.g., osteoporosis, renal insufficiency, immunodeficiency, leukocyte dysfunction).

History of head and neck radiotherapy.

Physical or mental disability preventing adequate oral hygiene or compliance.

Heavy smoking (>10 cigarettes/day).

Alcoholism or drug abuse.

Pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Bruxism or oral mucosal diseases.

Need for bone regeneration procedures before implant placement.

Inability or unwillingness to attend follow-up visits.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

40 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Narrow tie-base abutment
Experimental group
Description:
Patients received subcrestal bone-level implants restored with narrow tie-base abutments.
Treatment:
Device: Intervention Name (Arm 1): Narrow tie-base abutment Intervention Name (Arm 2): Regular tie-base abutment
Regular tie-base abutment
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
Patients received subcrestal bone-level implants restored with regular tie-base abutments.
Treatment:
Device: Intervention Name (Arm 1): Narrow tie-base abutment Intervention Name (Arm 2): Regular tie-base abutment

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Mohammed El-Sawy, PhD; Mohammed T. Khater, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems