Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of left ventricular lead pacing location in the non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) heart failure patient population. The left ventricular lead pacing location will be guided by either the pacing site with the largest amount of dyssynchrony as measured by the LV electrical delay (QLV) or the physician's standard of care implant approach.
Full description
This is a prospective, pilot, multi-center, double-blinded, randomized post-market study to assess the effect of left ventricular lead pacing location (guided via QLV measurement vs. standard of care approach) in non-LBBB patients.
In the QLV arm the physician will:
In the standard of care group, the left ventricular lead placement will be carried out according to the physician's standard of care implant approach.
The impact of the left ventricular lead position will be evaluated based on the patient's response to CRT utilizing the Clinical Composite Score (cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalizations, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and Patient Global Assessment). Authorized site personnel conducting the NYHA class assessment and Patient Global Assessment will be blinded to the randomization assignment and lead implant technique.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Have non-LBBB morphology (includes complete right bundle branch block and intraventricular conduction delay with a QRS duration ≥ 120ms)
Have the following indication per the 2013 updated American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society guidelines:
Receiving a new CRT implant or undergoing an upgrade from an existing implantable cardioverter defibrillator or pacemaker implant with no more than 10% right ventricular pacing
Are 18 years or older, or of legal age to give informed consent specific to state and local law
Ability to provide informed consent for study participation and is willing and able to comply with the prescribed follow-up tests and schedule of evaluations
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
248 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal