ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

CT-derived Virtual Stenting Optimize Coronary Revascularization (CT-COMPASS)

N

National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Status

Completed

Conditions

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Coronary Physiology
Computed Tomography

Treatments

Other: Virtual stent-guided incremental optimization strategy (VIOS)
Other: Standard angiographic strategy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06280638
2023-2095

Details and patient eligibility

About

A considerable number of patients presented with anatomically successful PCI results still suffer from functionally unresolved ischemia, which might be the cause for over one-fourth of patients experiencing recurrent angina at 1 year or adverse events at 2 years. Currently, the post-PCI physiology measurement is one of the effective metrics to quantify residual ischemia, and a suboptimal post-PCI result is strongly associated with worse outcomes. However, PCI optimization based on post-PCI physiology is, to certain extent, a provisional rescue action for a suboptimal index procedure, which may not be fully correctable "after the fact" given selected stents, site of deployment and procedural technique.

Computed tomography (CT) coronary physiology-derived virtual stenting (CT-VS) based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms is an augmented reality (AR) approach that simulates the post-stenting physiology assuming that the specified segment of the treated vessel is successfully dilated by implanting virtual stents. Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of optimizing PCI with CT-VS, with high consistency between pre-PCI simulated physiology result by CT-VS and actual post-PCI physiology results. Therefore, the application of CT-VS would help physicians to develop the best strategies while planning the procedure.

However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the efficacy of this novel physiological index that is available pre-PCI in achieving final post-PCI optimal physiological result. The Trials of "Computed Tomography Coronary Physiology-derived Virtual Stenting Guided Revascularization Strategy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CT-COMPASS)" was designed to assess the efficacy of a CT-VS vs. standard angiographic guidance in achieving post-PCI optimal physiological result (post-PCI FFR≥0.90).

Full description

Coronary physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves long-term prognosis in large clinical studies, and wire-based physiological assessments (e.g. fractional flow reserve [FFR], instantaneous wave-free ratio [iFR]) are recommended by international guidelines. Although prognosis of patients undergoing PCI has improved in recent decades with the continuous refinement of equipment, tools and techniques, a considerable number of patients presented with anatomically successful PCI results still suffer from functionally unresolved ischemia, which might be the cause for over one-fourth of patients experiencing recurrent angina or adverse events after angiographically successful PCI. Therefore, it is of great clinical importance to achieve complete resolution of ischemia and optimal functional results during the index procedure.

Currently, the post-PCI physiology measurement is one of the effective metrics to quantify residual ischemia, and a suboptimal post-PCI result is strongly associated with worse outcomes. However, PCI optimization based on post-PCI physiology is, to certain extent, a provisional rescue action for a suboptimal index procedure, which may not be fully correctable "after the fact" given selected stents, site of deployment and procedural technique. The resent TARGET-FFR trial demonstrated that post-PCI physiology-guided incremental optimization strategy (PIOS) failed to significantly improve the final physiological results compared to standard angiographic guidance. Therefore, it would be of significant interest if a preprocedural measurement would be able to anticipate to what extent the functional ischemia could be resolved. If residual ischemia estimated from the computation of post-PCI physiology appears to be present, this would help physicians to develop the best strategies while planning the procedure.

The Computed tomography (CT)-derived FFR (CT-FFR) is a novel non-invasive CCTA-based physiological index that has been validated to have good diagnostic accuracy in identifying physiologically significant coronary stenoses compared with FFR as the reference. The CT coronary physiology-derived virtual stenting (CT-VS) based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms, is an augmented reality (AR) approach that simulates the post-stenting physiology assuming that the specified segment of the treated vessel is successfully dilated by implanting virtual stents. Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of optimizing PCI with CT-VS, with high consistency between pre-PCI simulated physiology result by CT-VS and actual post-PCI physiology results. Therefore, the application of CT-VS would help physicians to develop the best strategies while planning the procedure.

However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the efficacy of this novel physiological index that is available pre-PCI in achieving final post-PCI optimal physiological result. The Trials of "Computed Tomography Coronary Physiology-derived Virtual Stenting Guided Revascularization Strategy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CT-COMPASS)" was designed to assess the efficacy of a CT-VS vs. standard angiographic guidance in achieving post-PCI optimal physiological result (post-PCI FFR≥0.90).

Virtual stenting-guided incremental optimization strategy (VIOS) Protocol: virtual Stenting analysis is conducted based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms by "Imaging-Heart Team" to determine simulated optimal treatment strategy according VIOS protocol. The details of VIOS protocol are as follows: 1) virtual stent with adequate stent parameters is initially implanted to treat lesion with maximal CT-FFR drop (ΔCT-FFR); 2) if the simulated post-PCI CT-FFR is ≥0.90, no further intervention will be performed, and the simulated optimal treatment strategy is determined. If simulated post-PCI CT-FFR is <0.90, the "Imaging-Heart Team" would then have the following options: a) if there is a CT-FFR drop ≥0.05 across the virtual stented segment(s), the parameters of virtual stent(s) would be optimized (i.e., number of stents, stent diameter, and stent length); b) if there is a CT-FFR drop ≥0.05 across a relatively focal (<20mm) unstented segment (without virtual stenting) which is suitable for further stenting then a further virtual stent would be implanted; c) simulated post-PCI CT-FFR remains <0.90 after steps a and/or b: if either of the above criteria remain, option of further optimization of virtual stent parameters or one more additional virtual stent. Following this, the result will be accepted. d) if the simulated CT-FFR gradient is interpreted to reflect diffuse atherosclerosis with no focal CT-FFR drop, the result is accepted.

Enrollment

280 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria

General Inclusion Criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years.
  2. Able to understand the trial design and provide written informed consent.
  3. Patients with a coronary CTA performed within 30 days.

CCTA Inclusion Criteria

  1. The CCTA angiograms amenable to CT-FFR measurement.
  2. At least 1 lesion of 50%-90% diameter stenosis in a coronary artery with ≥2.0mm reference vessel diameter by visual assessment.
  3. And this target vessel is of physiological ischemia as assessed by CT-FFR.

Angiographic Inclusion Criteria

  1. The interrogated vessel is indicated for intervention assessed by operator based on indications other than CT-FFR.

Exclusion Criteria

General Exclusion Criteria

  1. Cardiogenic shock or severe heart failure (NYHA ≥III or LVEF<30%).
  2. Severely impaired renal function: creatinine >150μmol/L or Cockcroft-Gault calculated GFR <45 ml/kg/1.73 m2 (calculated with Cockcroft-Gault formula).
  3. Allergy to iodine-containing contrast agents which cannot be adequately premedicated.

CCTA Exclusion Criteria

  1. The CCTA angiograms deems not amenable to CT-FFR measurement.
  2. Patients with only 1 coronary artery lesion with DS >90% with TIMI flow <3.
  3. An interrogated vessel presented with a CTO lesion.
  4. All coronary arteries were not physiologically ischemic.
  5. Coronary lesions favor CABG treatment.

Angiographic Exclusion Criteria

  1. The interrogated vessel with only 1 coronary artery lesion with DS >90% with TIMI flow <3.
  2. Coronary lesions favor CABG treatment.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

280 participants in 2 patient groups

Virtual stenting-guided incremental optimization strategy (VIOS)
Experimental group
Description:
Virtual Stenting analysis is conducted based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms by "Imaging-Heart Team" to determine simulated optimal treatment strategy according VIOS protocol. If the patient is assigned to the VIOS, the result of virtual stenting and recommended treatment strategy will be disclosed to the operator. The operator will then follow the recommended strategy to attempt to obtain the target optimal post-PCI FFR result. Blinded FFR must be obtained after PCI.
Treatment:
Other: Virtual stent-guided incremental optimization strategy (VIOS)
Standard angiographic strategy
Sham Comparator group
Description:
Virtual Stenting analysis is conducted based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms by "Imaging-Heart Team" to determine simulated optimal treatment strategy according VIOS protocol. If the patient is assigned to the standard angiographic strategy, the result of virtual stenting and recommended treatment strategy will be blinded to the operator. The operator will then perform PCI based on international guidelines, local protocols and practice. Blinded FFR must be obtained after PCI.
Treatment:
Other: Standard angiographic strategy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Zhihao Zheng, MD; Chenggang Zhu, MD, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems