ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Daily Sedative Interruption in Critically Ill Patients Being Managed With a Sedation Protocol. (SLEAP)

Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada logo

Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada

Status

Completed

Conditions

Critical Illness

Treatments

Procedure: Protocolized Sedation
Procedure: Protocolized sedation, with daily interruption

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of both a nurse-driven sedation protocol and daily sedative interruption, compared with a sedation protocol alone, result in better outcomes for mechanically ventilated adults.

Full description

All critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit receive medications to relieve pain and anxiety. However, accumulation of these medications can be associated with serious complications, most notably longer time on the breathing machine and in the ICU. Two strategies have been shown to dramatically improve patient outcomes: nurse-directed protocols for giving sedation, and daily interruption of sedation. However, these strategies have not been widely adopted, because of physicians' concerns, and because it is unclear which strategy is better. Given that patient outcome is improved with either of these strategies, the fundamental question that arises is whether patients managed with a combination of two strategies which both reduce drug accumulation (protocolized sedation and daily interruption) have an even better outcome than patients managed with only one of them (protocolized sedation).We are conducting a multicenter randomized trial in which 400 critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients will have their sedation managed with protocolized sedation alone, or both strategies. Primary outcomes are duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU and hospital lengths of stay. Secondary outcomes are the incidence of delirium, the use of neurologic tests, nurse and respiratory therapist effort associated with the sedation management, the incidence of patient self-removal of lines and tubes, and patient recall of the ICU stay. The results of this large multi-center trial will help to inform best practice with regard to sedation management of critically ill patients in Canada and elsewhere.

Enrollment

410 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or over
  • Mechanically ventilated, with anticipated need for MV ≥48 hrs
  • ICU team has decided to initiate continuous sedative/analgesic infusion(s)
  • informed consent from patient and/or SDM

Exclusion Criteria

  • Admission after resuscitation from cardiac arrest
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Currently receiving neuromuscular blocking agents
  • Allergy to midazolam and lorazepam
  • Lack of commitment to aggressive treatment
  • Previous enrolment in SLEAP, or current enrolment in related trial

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

410 participants in 2 patient groups

PS
Active Comparator group
Description:
Nurse-directed protocols for administering sedation and/or analgesia by continuous infusion.
Treatment:
Procedure: Protocolized Sedation
PS + DI
Active Comparator group
Description:
Nurse-directed protocols for administering sedation and/or analgesia, with daily interruption of sedation/analgesia
Treatment:
Procedure: Protocolized sedation, with daily interruption

Trial contacts and locations

16

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems