ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Damages From Macular Grasping During Vitrectomy Comparing Traditional and 3D Microscope

A

Anna Rita Daniele, MD

Status

Completed

Conditions

Comparison of 3D Visualization and Microscope for VR Surgery

Treatments

Device: Macular surgery with standard operating microscope
Device: Macular surgery with NGENUITY surgical display system

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

NCT05113212
2997CESC

Details and patient eligibility

About

Randomized, prospective, descriptive and comparative clinical study. The comparison is between a group of patients affected by macular pucker or macular hole, whose macular peeling is performed using a traditional optical microscope (Leica F40) - control arm, and a group of patients affected by macular pucker or macular hole whose macular peeling is performed by 3D heads-up microscopy system (NGenuity 3D, Alcon) - experimental arm.

It is a blind study for both the operator that collects data and for the statistician.

Enrollment

64 patients

Sex

All

Ages

21+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients affected by macular pucker or macular hole, whose internal limiting membrane peeling need to be performed
  • Willing and able to understand and sign an informed consent
  • Willing and able to undergo postoperative examinations of the protocol program:
  • ≥ 21 years of age, of both sexes and any race

Exclusion criteria

  • History of ocular trauma or amblyopia.
  • Other ocular pathologies (glaucoma, uveitis, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, macular degeneration, Irvine Gass Syndrome, degenerative myopia, malformation of the optic disc, i.e.: tilted disc, optic disc pit, posterior staphyloma)
  • Multiple procedures programmed during the surgery
  • Pregnancy, lactation or programmed pregnancy during the course of the study.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

64 participants in 2 patient groups

Control arm
Active Comparator group
Description:
patients affected by macular pucker or macular hole, whose internal limiting membrane peeling is performed using a traditional optical microscope (Leica F40)
Treatment:
Device: Macular surgery with standard operating microscope
Experimental arm
Experimental group
Description:
patients affected by macular pucker or macular hole whose internal limiting membrane peeling is performed by 3D heads-up microscopy system (NGenuity 3D)
Treatment:
Device: Macular surgery with NGENUITY surgical display system

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems