Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
BACKGROUND/RATIONALE:
Treatment outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have improved enormously during the past decade due to the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. As a result, 67 to 91% of paediatric patients and 66% of adult patients is still in sustained remission two years after the initiation of anti-TNF therapy. Prolonged use of anti-TNFs comes with disadvantages such as dose dependent susceptibility to infections and dermatological adverse effects. Preliminary, mostly uncontrolled studies suggest that dose reduction by dosing interval lengthening is a realistic option in a relevant proportion of patients with IBD, provided that intensive follow-up is applied.
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate whether a faecal calprotectin (FC) guided strategy of anti-TNF dosing interval lengthening is non-inferior in maintaining remission in patients with IBD, compared with an unchanged dosing interval.
Full description
STUDY DESIGN:
International, multi-centre, prospective, partially randomised patient-preference trial.
STUDY POPULATION:
Study population: Eligible patients are aged 12-25 years with luminal Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), who have three consecutive faecal calprotectin (FC) results in the target range (i.e. <250 µg/g for CD patients; <150 µg/g for UC patients) over a period of 6 months at study entry or recently confirmed endoscopic remission.
DE-ESCALATION STRATEGY:
In patients treated with adalimumab, the dosing interval will be lengthened from 2 to 3 weeks. In patients treated with infliximab, the dosing interval will be lengthened from 8 to 12 weeks. FC rapid tests will be performed every 4 weeks and rapid tests for anti-TNF trough levels will be performed every 12 weeks.
MAIN STUDY ENDPOINTS:
The primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of out-of-range FC results at 48 weeks follow-up. Secondary endpoints include time to get out-of-range FC results, cumulative incidence of anti-TNF associated adverse effects, proportion of patients progressing from out-of-range FC to loss-of-response and identification of predictors of successful de-escalation.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Patients with reduced anti-TNF exposure may have a higher risk of out-of-range FC results and, on the other hand, may benefit from fewer hospital visits or injections and possibly a decrease in adverse effects of anti-TNF therapy. Tight monitoring of FC levels (i.e. 4-weekly) will allow institution of re-escalation before the patient manifests clinical signs of relapse. This study cannot be conducted without the participation of minors and young adults, who typically have a short disease duration. Early treatment with anti-TNF agents possibly modifies the course of their disease, which makes provision for safe deescalation.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
148 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Marleen Bouhuys, MD MsC; Patrick F van Rheenen, MD PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal