Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this clinical study is to compare the effectiveness of different methods for decontaminating dental implant surfaces in the treatment of peri-implantitis. The main question it aims to answer is:
Which combination of an antiseptic solution and an air-polishing powder is most effective for the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis? Researchers will compare three different treatment combinations (Miramistin with sodium bicarbonate, chlorhexidine with erythritol, and Octenisept with glycine) in patients diagnosed with peri-implantitis. Participants will receive the combined treatment at intervals of 7-10 days for one month. The study will assess changes in probing depth, bleeding, and bone loss at 1 and 2.5 months after treatment to determine the most effective and balanced approach for preserving implant surfaces and promoting tissue healing.
Full description
This is a prospective, interventional study involving 48 patients diagnosed with peri-implantitis.
Groups: Participants were allocated into three groups (n=16 per group) to receive one of three treatment combinations.
Group 1: Treatment with Miramistin solution (0.01%) and air-polishing with sodium bicarbonate powder.
Group 2: Treatment with Chlorhexidine solution (0.05%) and air-polishing with erythritol powder.
Group 3: Treatment with Octenisept solution and air-polishing with glycine powder.
Intervention: Each patient received the assigned combination treatment at intervals of 7-10 days over one month.
Outcome Measures: Clinical parameters were assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 2.5 months after the start of treatment:
Primary Clinical Outcomes: Changes in probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BOP).
Secondary Clinical Outcomes: Changes in plaque index (PLI), gingival index (GI), presence of suppuration, and radiographic bone loss (assessed via periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)). The need for subsequent surgical intervention was also recorded.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
64 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal