Dental Age Estimation by Different Methods in Patients With Amelogenesis Imperfecta

Istanbul University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Dental Age Estimation; Amelogenesis Imperfecta

Treatments: Diagnostic Test: Cameriere method; Diagnostic Test: London Atlas method

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05343247

2021/76

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study is to investigate whether there is a significant difference in dental age between children with amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) and healthy controls using Cameriere European formula and London Atlas. If there is a significant difference in dental age between children with AI and healthy controls, it is aimed to create a new formula.

Full description

One of the developmental enamel defects, amelogenesis imperfecta (AI), is also known as enamel hypoplasia/hypomineralization. It is a rare inherited disease that affects the enamel structure, amount and component in primary and permanent teeth, and it has been reported to be accompanied by some dental anomalies and nephrocalcinosis. Dental anomalies and nephrocalcinosis can affect tooth development, and there are limited studies examining tooth development in these individuals.Dental age is widely evaluated by pedodontists, forensic dentists and orthodontists. While a delay in tooth development may be associated with growth retardation and learning difficulties, dental age determination can also be used for forensic age determination for children whose birth information is uncertain. A clear assessment of maturation in children with continued growth is important in establishing a dental treatment plan.

Dental age is widely evaluated by pedodontists, forensic dentists and orthodontists. While a delay in tooth development may be associated with growth retardation and learning difficulties, dental age determination can also be used for forensic age determination for children whose birth information is uncertain. A clear assessment of maturation in children with continued growth is important in establishing a dental treatment plan.

There are two basic approaches to dental age determination in children:

1. evaluation of eruption of teeth in the oral cavity,
2. evaluation of the development and mineralization of crowns and roots on dental radiographs.

In many methods, the developmental stages of different numbers of permanent teeth are used.

One of the most widely used methods of dental age determination recently is the European formula of Cameriere et al., which is calculated based on open apex. It has been reported that this method has been tested on different population groups, and the results are accurate and reliable.

An atlas method was proposed by a group of London researchers in 2010. The Atlas shows all the teeth array images of certain age groups as a schematic series. Age determination is made by deciding which reference image matches the individual's panoramic radiography image more.

Enrollment: 416 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 5 to 13 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• 5-13 years old
• Healthy children
• Children with AI
• Patients without missing left mandibular permanent teeth on panoramic radiography

Exclusion criteria

• Children older than 5 years old and younger than 14 years (children that cannot be assessed by the Willems and Cameriere method)
• Poor quality panoramic radiography
• Patients who have received orthodontic treatment
• Patients who received restorative or endodontic treatment

Trial design

416 participants in 2 patient groups

Children with AI

Treatment:

Diagnostic Test: London Atlas method

Diagnostic Test: Cameriere method

Healthy controls with gender-age match

Treatment:

Diagnostic Test: London Atlas method

Diagnostic Test: Cameriere method