Determine the Effect of Targeted High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Reducing Post-stroke Upper Limb Motor Impairments

Carle Foundation

Status: Enrolling

Conditions: Stroke

Treatments: Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation (high- definition)

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05479006

14906

Details and patient eligibility

About

Significant motor impairments occur in 80% of individuals after moderate to severe stroke and impact the body side to the lesioned hemisphere. Typical motor impairments involve loss of dexterity with highly prevalent upper limb flexion synergy. Advances in treating flexion synergy impairments have been hampered by a lack of precision rehabilitation. Previous studies suggest and support the role of cortico-reticulospinal tract (CRST) hyperexcitability in post-stroke flexion synergy. CRST hyperexcitability is often caused by damage to the corticospinal tract (CST). We hypothesize that: 1) inhibiting the contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (cPMd) will directly reduce the CRST hyperexcitability and thus, reduce the expression of the flexion synergy; 2) facilitating the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (iM1) will improve the excitability of the damaged CST, therefore reducing the CRST hyperexcitability and the flexion synergy. we propose to use a novel targeted high-definition tDCS (THD-tDCS) to specifically modulate the targeted cortical regions for testing his hypothesis, via the following aims: Aim 1. Evaluate the effect of cathodal THD-tDCS over the cPMd on reducing the CRST hyperexcitability and the expression of flexion synergy. Aim 2. Evaluate the effect of anodal THD-tDCS over the iM1 on improving the excitability of the CST, and determine whether this, thus, also reduces the CRST hyperexcitability and the flexion synergy. Aim 3. Evaluate the confluence effect of bilateral THD-tDCS, i.e., simultaneous cathodal stimulation over the cPMd and anodal over the iM1.

Full description

This sham-controlled cross-over study design will include four visits: 1) anodal stimulation targeting the ipsilesional hemisphere, 2) cathodal one at the contralesional hemisphere, 3) bilateral stimulation with anodal on the ipsilesional hemisphere and cathodal on the contralesional hemisphere and 4) a sham stimulation visit. The sequence of the stimulations will be randomized and double-blinded (assessor and participants). After each intervention, there will be at least 2 weeks wash-out period before participants receive the next intervention and assessments. Each visit will last up to 3 hours including the preparation time and breaks.

We will use neuro-navigation high-definition tDCS (NNG HD-tDCS) to target specific brain regions in a more precise way than before. A subject-specific head model will be built to evaluate the effect of lesion size and location on the electrical field of tDCS. The MR images (if available, otherwise CT images) will be used to build this subject-specific head model. The stimulation electrode montage and inter-electrode distance will be carefully examined by computer simulation to determine the optimal setup and dosage for NNG HD-tDCS.

The patient time commitment in this study is approximately 10 weeks where subjects have 4 x 1-day intervention and measurements, with 2 weeks washout the period in between.

The total number of potential enrolled subjects in this pilot study is 30.

Enrollment: 30 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 90 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Paresis confined to one side, with substantial motor impairment of the paretic upper limb
• Capacity to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

• Muscle tone abnormalities and motor or sensory impairment in the non-paretic limb
• Severe wasting or contracture or significant sensory deficits in the paretic upper limb
• Severe cognitive or affective dysfunction that prevents normal communication and understanding of consent or instruction
• Severe concurrent medical problems (e.g. cardiorespiratory impairment)
• Using a pacemaker
• Metal implants in the head
• Known adverse reactions to TMS and tDCS
• Pregnant

Trial design

Primary purpose: Basic Science

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Crossover Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

30 participants in 4 patient groups

Anodal stimulation

Active Comparator group

Description:

Anodal stimulation targets the primary motor cortex (arm area) in the lesioned hemisphere, sham on the contralesional hemisphere.

Treatment:

Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation (high- definition)

Cathodal stimulation

Active Comparator group

Description:

Cathodal stimulation targets the dorsal premotor cortex (arm area) in the contralesional hemisphere, sham on the lesioned hemisphere.

Treatment:

Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation (high- definition)

Bilateral Stimulation

Active Comparator group

Description:

Anodal stimulation targets the primary motor cortex (arm area) in the lesioned hemisphere and cathodal stimulation targets the dorsal premotor cortex (arm area) in the contralesional hemisphere at the same time.

Treatment:

Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation (high- definition)

Sham stimulation

Sham Comparator group

Description:

Sham stimulation to both hemisphere of the brain

Treatment:

Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation (high- definition)