ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Determining Learning Ability in People With Aphasia

M

MGH Institute of Health Professions

Status

Completed

Conditions

Aphasia

Treatments

Behavioral: Standardized cognitive-linguistic assessment
Behavioral: SRT Observational Learning
Other: Brain imaging
Behavioral: AGL Rule-based Learning
Behavioral: AGL Observational Learning

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
NIH

Identifiers

NCT05119023
R21DC019203 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
2021p000033

Details and patient eligibility

About

Aphasia is an impairment in the expression or comprehension of language that results from stroke, traumatic brain injury or progressive neurological disease. Approximately two million people in the United States suffer from aphasia, which has profound impacts on quality of life, the ability to return to work and participation in life activities. Research has shown that speech-language therapy, the treatment for aphasia, can significantly improve people's ability to communicate. However, a major limitation in the field of aphasia rehabilitation is the lack of predictability in patients' response to therapy and the inability to tailor treatment to individuals. Currently, aphasia treatments are selected largely based on patient's language abilities and language deficits with little consideration of learning ability, which this study refers to as learning phenotype. Learning phenotype has been used to inform rehabilitation approaches in other domains but is not currently considered in aphasia. The overarching hypothesis of this work is that poor alignment of learning ability and language therapy limits progress for patients and presents a barrier to individualizing treatment.

The objectives of the proposed study are to (1) determine the learning phenotype of individuals with aphasia, and (2) examine how lesion characteristics (size and location of damage to the brain), language ability and cognitive ability relate to learning ability. To accomplish objectives, investigators propose to measure implicit (observational) and explicit (rule-based) learning ability in people with aphasia via computer-based tasks. Regression models will be used to examine brain and behavioral factors that relate to learning ability.

Full description

Aphasia is an impairment in the expression or comprehension of language that can limit people's ability to communicate needs, reduce comprehension in complex environments, and prevent a return to work or limit participation in everyday life activities. An approximate 795,000 individuals suffer from strokes each year, with 25% to 40% resulting in aphasia. The process of aphasia rehabilitation engages many mechanisms of learning as patients are guided to relearn, reaccess or regain functional use of language via therapies that involve stimuli, tasks, cues, and feedback. Currently however, clinicians base decisions about the tasks and targets of treatment methods on language deficits, and the strength and weakness of learning systems is rarely, if ever, considered. The understanding of learning in aphasia and the way that learning influences treatment outcomes is incomplete and presents a barrier in the ability for clinicians to individually tailor treatment and reliably predict outcomes.

An in-depth characterization of learning in aphasia is important, as research has suggested that multiple learning systems exist. Furthermore, manipulations to stimuli, task, and feedback can lead to differential recruitment of learning systems and unlock learning potential, particularly in clinical populations. Prior work in aphasia supports the hypothesis that individuals with aphasia suffer from impaired learning mechanisms and are sensitive to task manipulations. Such findings demonstrate that that people with aphasia (PWA) are successful learning in some conditions and not others and provides the rationale for the proposed series of studies focused on characterizing learning abilities in individuals with aphasia.

The current project proposes to use a single-subject experimental design to determine the behavioral learning phenotype of individuals with aphasia subsequent to stroke. Implicit (observational) and explicit (rule-based) learning is quantified in individuals with aphasia using short computer-based experimental tasks. Investigators additionally explore whether effect size of learning under observational and rule-based conditions is predicted by lesion characteristics (size and extent of brain damage in regions of interest), cognitive abilities (such as attention, working memory, executive function) and language severity. Findings will help establish the behavioral and biological validity of learning phenotypes in aphasia and will provide essential information needed to support future treatment studies that align learning ability and language therapy to promote enhanced outcomes.

Overall Study Design The study will be conducted at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) MGH-Institute of Health Professions. Structural scans will be obtained at the MGH Athinoula A. Martinos Biomedical Imaging Center. Participants with aphasia subsequent to stroke, in the chronic stages of their aphasia (at least 6 months post-stroke) will be recruited to participate. All participants will complete standardized assessments of cognitive and language abilities and will complete computer-based tasks evaluating observational and rule-based learning ability. Structural scans will be obtained to quantify the presence brain damage in parts of the brain that are thought to relate to learning. A key novelty of the approach is to introduce an evaluation of learning ability into diagnostic models of aphasia, incorporating subject-specific behavioral and neural metrics.

Enrollment

18 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Aphasia due to left hemisphere stroke
  • Must be in the chronic stages of aphasia, at least 6 months post onset of stroke
  • Must be between the ages of 18 and 80 years of age
  • Must have near to normal uncorrected or corrected vision per self-report
  • Must be medically and neurologically stable and at least wheelchair ambulatory

Exclusion criteria

  • History of significant psychiatric or medical disease
  • Presence of visual field cuts or visual neglect as determined by the Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test (CLQT; Helm-Estabrooks, 2017) symbol cancellation task
  • Implanted medical devices or metal fragments that are not MRI safe

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

18 participants in 1 patient group

Characterization of learning
Experimental group
Description:
All participants complete behavioral (computer-based) learning tasks that measure their ability to learn observationally (observational learning ability: SRT Observational learning and AGL observational learning) and via rules (rule-based AGL learning ability, \[RB AGL\]). Participants additionally complete standardized cognitive-linguistic tests. Learning tasks and cognitive linguistic tests are completed over the course of 2 to 3 sessions, each lasting around 2 hours each. The AGL Observational task was always completed before the rule-based AGL task. SRT Observational and AGL Observational task order was counterbalanced. Enrolled participants who were safe to scan via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) completed a structural MRI scan between one-month and five months from behavioral testing of learning.
Treatment:
Behavioral: AGL Observational Learning
Behavioral: AGL Rule-based Learning
Other: Brain imaging
Behavioral: SRT Observational Learning
Behavioral: Standardized cognitive-linguistic assessment

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems