Status
Conditions
About
The quality of care associated with medical procedures, such as procedural sedation, has historically been assessed from the perspective of the healthcare professional, wherein the appropriateness of the services provided and the skill with which this care was performed were considered. However, more recently, the perspectives of consumers of healthcare services (i.e. the patients) have also been sought in the form of patient satisfaction. A review of the literature shows that patient satisfaction is routinely assessed when determining the effectiveness of sedation; however, it is less frequently assessed as the primary outcome. In child-specific, validated studies, limitations are noted with respect to being validated in a language other than English and failing to encompass a variety of procedures. As a result, these validated tools are not appropriate for use with pediatric populations undergoing procedural sedation in North America, nor are these validated tools amenable to comparison with our proposed tool.
Full description
Due to the central unit procedural sedation team servicing several areas of specialty, a varied patient satisfaction tool is required to ensure all concerns pertaining to sedation in each specialty are addressed, as well as allowing consistency between specialties to be examined. Therefore, the objective is to develop and validate a procedural sedation satisfaction tool for use with a variety of specialties requiring pediatric procedural sedation.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria for Parents:
Exclusion Criteria for Parents:
Inclusion Criteria for Healthcare Team Members:
Exclusion Criteria for Healthcare Team Members:
650 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal