Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
To develop an educational patient decision aid for advanced cancer patients to prepare them to have conversations with their clinicians about treatment options (Treatments in Advanced cancer - Decision Aid, TA-DA).
Full description
Primary Objectives:
The study objective is to develop an educational patient DA (Treatments in Advanced cancer - Decision Aid, TA-DA) to assist patients, their caregivers, and clinicians to make an informed decision about third-line or beyond palliative systemic therapy for advanced cancer. To fulfill the study's objectives, we will complete 3 study parts:
Using qualitative methods, explore the decision-making needs of patients with advanced cancer, their caregivers, and clinicians, about third-line or beyond palliative systemic therapy; identify initial preferences and recommendations to inform the design of the educational patient DA in Part II.
Following a user-centered design approach, develop and measure the acceptability of an educational patient DA to promote shared decision making among patients with advanced cancer, their caregivers, and clinicians, about third-line or beyond palliative systemic therapy.
Conduct a pilot RCT to estimate the effect of the educational patient DA (TA-DA) on patient's knowledge of their treatment options.
Secondary Objectives:
Examine the impact of the educational patient DA (TA-DA) on patients' illness understanding (Prigerson's items), preparation for decision making (PrepDM Scale), decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale [DCS]), quality of the shared decision-making process (SDM Process Scale), decisional regret (decisional regret scale), therapeutic alliance (The Human Connection Scale [THC]), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 [GAD-7]), final treatment choice, and end-of-life care outcomes (e.g., systemic therapy use in last month of life).
Examine the impact of the educational patient DA (TA-DA) on caregivers' knowledge of the patient's treatment options, illness understanding (Prigerson's items), preparation for decision making (PrepDM Scale), decisional conflict (DCS), quality of the shared decision- making process (SDM Process Scale), therapeutic alliance (THC Scale), and anxiety (GAD-7).
Examine the acceptability (Ottawa Acceptability Scale) of the educational patient DA (TA-DA) among patients, caregivers, and oncologists in the educational patient DA group. Examine the acceptability (modified Acceptability of Intervention Measure [AIM]), appropriateness (Intervention Appropriateness Measure [IAM]), and feasibility (Feasibility of Intervention Measure [FIM]) of the educational patient DA (TA-DA) among clinicians in the educational patient DA group.
Exploratory Objective:
2.3.1. (Part III) Examine the impact of the educational patient DA (TA-DA) on the concordance between patient-caregiver dyads for knowledge of the patient's treatment options, illness understanding (Prigerson's items), preparation for decision making (PrepDM Scale), decisional conflict (DCS), quality of the shared decision-making process (SDM Process Scale), therapeutic alliance (THC Scale), and anxiety (GAD-7).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Clinicians (Part I/II/III):
MD Anderson medical oncologists and APPs who provide care to patients with advanced cancer
Patients (Part I/II/III):
Age 18 or over
Diagnosis of advanced cancer (i.e., metastatic, relapsed, and/or incurable disease as defined by the treating oncologist) who has received at least 2 lines of palliative systemic therapy*
Patient-rated ECOG performance status of 1-3 for Part I/II and 2-3 for Part III
Able to make treatment decisions based on the clinical judgement of the oncology team
English speaking
Caregivers (Part I/II/III):
Age 18 or older
Currently a primary caregiver to a patient who satisfies the patient eligibility criteria listed above
For the study purposes, a primary caregiver is defined as:
Able to provide informed consent and participate in the study
English speaking
Exclusion criteria
Any patient who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
155 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
David Hui, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal