Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This trial investigates the effects of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and an in-hospital diabetes team on in-hospital glycemic and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to standard glucose point-of-care (POC) testing and an in-hospital diabetes team.
Full description
In Denmark and worldwide, 15-20 % of hospitalised patients have diabetes mellitus. For most patients, diabetes is not the primary cause of admission. The patients are therefore under the care of non-diabetes specialists. Consequently, diabetes management can be inadequate resulting in hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and increased glycemic variability, which might increase patient mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay. Despite these challenges, a recent review concludes that in-hospital diabetes management is under-researched. Therefore, new in-hospital diabetes management strategies are greatly needed.
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) might accommodate this need by providing 288 glucose readings per day compared to usual glucose point-of-care (POC) testing from finger-prick blood 3-5 times per day during admission. CGM glucose levels can be transmitted from the patient's room to a monitoring screen at the nursing stations. This setup is called telemetric CGM. Outstanding results on glycemic and clinical outcomes in an out-hospital setting exist, however, In-hospital CGM has been associated only with a clinically insignificant reduction of mean daily glucose levels and a small increased detection rate of hypoglycemia of glucose levels <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) compared to POC. Reasons for this might be that an in-hospital diabetes team (i.e., educated diabetes nurses with CGM competencies) is imperative in achieving optimal use of telemetric CGM.
This trial investigates if telemetric CGM and an in-hospital diabetes team improve patients' in-hospital glycemic and clinical outcomes compared to POC glucose testing and an in-hospital diabetes team
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
166 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, MD, DMSC, Clinical Professor; Mikkel Thor Olsen, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal