Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
A Prospective, observational, single center diagnostic study to investigate the the diagnostic agreement between QFR and the pressure wire-based iFR in a real world setting.
Full description
During coronary angiography, intermediate stenoses can not be adequately assessed by visual assessment alone. It is necessary to evaluate the functional significance to guide their treatment.
Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is the current gold standard for determining this functional significance but its adoption in clinical practice remains low. The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is an alternative way to determine the flow-limiting characteristics of a coronary stenosis with a pressure wire but without the need to induce hyperemia. Large randomised trials have confirmed the non-inferiority of iFR in respect to FFR in terms of outcome.
Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) is another new method for evaluating the functional significance of coronary stenosis It is a software-based analysis of conventional angiographic images to estimate the pressure drop caused by a coronary stenosis. The diagnostic agreement with FFR seemed promising in the FAVOR Pilot Study and a larger trial is enrolling for confirmation.
A stepwise approach of QFR and iFR could make the functional assessment of intermediate stenoses more practical and cost-effective. However before being used as a combination in daily practice, QFR has to be validated in respect to iFR.
The primary objective of the trial is to investigate the diagnostic agreement between QFR and the pressure wire-based iFR in a real world setting
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
250 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Christoph Jensen, MD, PHD; Pieter Ghijselinck, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal