Diagnostic Efficiency of Touch Imprints Versus Smears

University of Mississippi

Status: Completed

Conditions: Diagnostic Self Evaluation

Treatments: Other: Cytologic techniques used for rapid on site interpretation

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03224910

2017-0076

Details and patient eligibility

About

Cytopathologists work along with radiologist in the diagnosis of lesions. Rapid on site interpretation (ROSE) of fine needle aspiration (FNA) smears of radiologically suspicious lesions is a common clinical practice. In the last years, the investigators have seen trend towards needle core biopsies of radiologically suspicious lesions. The investigators want to analyze the challenges of rapid on site interpretation of touch imprints (TI) of needle core biopsies (NCB) versus fine needle aspiration smears.

Full description

This is a retrospective study in which the investigators will analyze the quality of the smears and the touch imprints, the cellularity, the cytomorphologic features of the specimens and the presence of adequate material for ancillary studies. The specimens will be searched through the University of Mississippi Medical Center's Pathology Laboratory information system (Copath), from January 2011 to December 2017. The retrospective cases (January 2011 up to now) will be retrieved using natural language search of fine needle aspiration and touch imprints. The slides of those cases will be reviewed and the cytomorphologic features will be described.

Enrollment: 47 patients

Sex: All

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• 1. Computerized tomography (CT)-Guided Fine needle aspiration (FNA) /Needle core biopsy (NCB) specimens from any site.2. Ultrasound (US) guided FNA/NCB.

Exclusion criteria

• 1. Specimens obtained through endoscopic fine needle aspirations.2. US-guided specimens from thyroid3. Exfoliative specimens like sputum or urine4. Gynecologic cytology specimens.5. Outside cytology consult cases6. Pathologist performed FNA's