ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Diagnostic Imaging Strategies for Patients With Stable Chest Pain and Intermediate Risk of Coronary Artery Disease (DISCHARGE)

Charité University Medicine Berlin logo

Charité University Medicine Berlin

Status

Completed

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Treatments

Procedure: Computed tomography angiography (cardiac CT)
Procedure: Invasive coronary angiography (ICA)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02400229
EC-GA 603266 (Other Grant/Funding Number)
Z 5 - 22462/2 - 2014-001 (Other Identifier)
EA1/294/13

Details and patient eligibility

About

The primary hypothesis is that computed tomography (CT) is superior to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) concerning the primary endpoint MACE (MACE = major adverse cardiovascular event; defined as at least one of the following: cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke) after a maximum follow-up of 4 years, in other words, that CT will result in a significantly lower rate of MACE. Secondary outcomes include MICE (MICE = minor cardiovascular events), procedural complications, cost-effectiveness, radiation exposure, cross-over to CT or ICA, gender differences, and health-related quality of life.

Full description

The primary objective of this prospective pragmatic randomised controlled trial (PRCT) in 3546 patients is to evaluate the possible superiority of a CT-based patient management over an ICA-based management strategy in stable chest pain patients with intermediate pretest probability (10-60%) of coronary artery disease. The primary outcome measure is the occurrence of MACE (MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events; defined as at least one of the following: cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke) after a maximum follow-up of 4 years after CT or ICA. Secondary outcomes include health related quality of life, cost-effectiveness, cross-over to ICA/CT. Procedural complications are classified into major and minor. Major procedural complications are a composite end-point and include death, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and further complications prolonging hospitalization by at least 24 hrs,as well as dissection (coronary, aorta), cardiogenic shock, cardiac tamponade, retroperitoneal bleeding, cardiac arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation), cardiac arrest. Possible minor procedural complications: Hematoma at the puncture site, secondary bleeding at the puncture site, bradycardia, angina without infarction, allergoid contrast agent reaction, stent migration, hypotension requiring treatment, headache, hyperthyreodism, skin tissue and nerve injuries, extravasate, cardiac arrhythmia, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), infections, femoral arterial occlusion (or arterial access vessel) or dissection, new requirement for dialysis, DVT/pulmonary embolism, closure or injury of vessels, injury of the heart (e.g. valve or myocardium), , perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding, genital-urinary bleeding, other major bleeding, red blood cell (RBC)/whole blood transfusion, twisting or rupture of the catheter part, other equipment mishaps (e.g. retained foreign body guidewire fracture), development of arterio-venous fistula(s), development of pseudo aneurysm at puncture site, dissection (except coronary dissection), permanent edema (e.g. due to lymphatic congestion at puncture site), embolisation of central or peripheral vessels due to thromboembolis, acute closure of coronary vessels, stent infection, heart failure, wrong patient or wrong procedure and other.

This study is a European multicentre study conducted at 26 clinical centres in 16 European countries and is methodologically based on the single-centre CAD-Man trial conducted by Charité (NCT00844220). The pragmatic approach of the study ensures generating practical and usable outcomes for clinical decision-making according to comparative effectiveness research methodology.

In a preceding pilot study, data for cost-effectiveness analyses and image-quality analyses are collected and methods are defined for implementation in the main PRCT. Also appropriate instruments for health related quality of life are being chosen.

DISCHARGE receives funding from the 7th Framework Programme of the European Commission (EC-GA 603266).

Enrollment

3,546 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

30+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with suspected coronary artery disease with stable chest pain and intermediate pretest probability (10-60%) of CAD referred for conventional coronary angiography.

"Stable chest pain" defined as not:

  • being acute (= first appearance within the last 48 hours) or
  • instable (= a) first appearance with at least Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Grading Scale (CCS) Class III, b) progredient with at least 1 CCS Class to at least CCS Class III or, now at rest for at least 20 min) angina pectoris
  • Patients at least 30 years of age
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients on hemodialysis
  • No sinus rhythm
  • Pregnancy
  • Any medical condition that leads to the concern that participation is not in the best interest of health (e.g., extensive comorbidities)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

3,546 participants in 2 patient groups

Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA)
Experimental group
Description:
Computed Tomography Angiography including coronary calcium scoring and coronary computed tomography angiography
Treatment:
Procedure: Computed tomography angiography (cardiac CT)
Invasive coronary angiography (ICA)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Invasive coronary angiography
Treatment:
Procedure: Invasive coronary angiography (ICA)

Trial contacts and locations

20

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems