ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Differences in Morbidity Between a Necessity Endotracheal Suctioning Protocol Versus a Routine Endotracheal Suctioning

H

Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe

Status

Completed

Conditions

Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Arrhythmias
Cardiac Arrest
Hypoxemia

Treatments

Procedure: Routine endotracheal suctioning
Procedure: Necessity endotracheal suctioning

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01069185
5100-66779

Details and patient eligibility

About

Morbidity frequency associated to a endotracheal suctioning is different between a necessity endotracheal suctioning protocol versus a routine endotracheal protocol.

Full description

Endotracheal aspiration is a very useful procedure. It has several adverse events every time that aspiration is practiced. This trials wants to identify which protocol (necessity versus routine) could be better to practice in pediatrics intensive care unit with less risk.

Enrollment

92 patients

Sex

All

Ages

1 month to 14 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Children older than 1 month until 14 years old requiring orotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

  • High frequency ventilation mode

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

92 participants in 2 patient groups

Necessity endotracheal suctioning
Experimental group
Description:
Endotracheal suctioning depends on clinical manifestations
Treatment:
Procedure: Necessity endotracheal suctioning
Routine endotracheal suctioning
Other group
Description:
Endotracheal suctioning every two hours
Treatment:
Procedure: Routine endotracheal suctioning

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems