ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Diffuse Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Recruitment Maneuver, and sRAGE (DAMAGE Study)

U

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 4

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Treatments

Other: Recruitment Maneuver (RM) sham group
Other: Sham recruitment maneuver (RM) group

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01600651
CHU-0119

Details and patient eligibility

About

RAGE, the receptor for advanced glycation end products, is a novel marker of alveolar epithelial type I cell injury, and soluble RAGE (sRAGE) is elevated in the plasma and in the pulmonary edema fluid from patients with ALI/ARDS. Few data are available about the influence of ventilatory interventions on levels of sRAGE in the setting of ALI/ARDS. The purpose of this prospective monocentric randomized controlled cross-over study is to describe the effects of a recruitment maneuver (RM) on plasma sRAGE levels during diffuse ARDS.

Full description

BACKGROUND:

The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is now identified as a marker of alveolar type I cell injury. RAGE is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily that acts as a multiligand receptor and is involved in propagating inflammatory responses. While the precise function of RAGE remains unclear, the elevated levels of RAGE, and its soluble isoform sRAGE, correlate with severity of ALI/ARDS in human and animal studies, and higher sRAGE levels could reflect impaired alveolar fluid clearance. Lung morphology, as assessed by loss of aeration distribution patterns on computed tomography (CT) scan, predicts the response to recruitment maneuvers in patients with ARDS: patients presenting with nonfocal (diffuse) lung morphology are more likely to respond to a RM, resulting in an increase in arterial oxygenation, net alveolar fluid clearance, and significant alveolar recruitment as revealed by pressure-volume curve analysis.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The purpose of this prospective, randomized and controlled, cross-over study is to compare the effects of a RM on plasma sRAGE levels (measured 5 minutes before, 5 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours and 6 hours after the RM) and plasma sRAGE levels measured during a "sham" or "control" sequence, in patients with diffuse ARDS.

Mechanically ventilated ICU patients with ARDS criteria (based on the 1994 American-European Consensus Conference definition for ARDS) and nonfocal CT scan lung morphology will be included within 24 hours of disease onset. Then, patients will be randomized into 2 groups: a "RM-SHAM" group when RM sequence precedes a sham evaluation period, and a "SHAM-RM" group, in which patients receive a sham sequence before the RM sequence. Patients will receive protective ventilation, as recommended, before, during and after evaluation periods. RM consists of the application of 40 cmH20 airway pressure for 40 seconds.

Blood will be sampled from an indwelling arterial catheter, in order to analyze arterial blood gases and sRAGE levels, 5 minutes before the RM (or a 40 second-long sham period), 5 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours and 6 hours after the RM (or a 40 second-long sham period). Electric impedance tomography will be evaluated 5 minutes before and 1 hour after the RM.

Enrollment

24 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • ICU patients under mechanical ventilation
  • Patients within the first 24 hours after onset of ARDS according to the 1994 American-European Consensus Conference (AECC)
  • PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 200 with external PEEP >5 cmH2O
  • "Nonfocal" loss of aeration based on CT scan lung morphology analysis, as defined by the "CT scan ARDS study group" criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy
  • Acute exacerbation of diabetes
  • Dialysis for end-stage kidney disease
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Amyloidosis
  • Evolutive neoplastic lesion
  • Known or suspected history of allergy to cisatracurium
  • Chronic respiratory disease requiring long term oxygen therapy or long term ventilation
  • Confirmed or suspected elevated intracranial pressure
  • Confirmed or suspected bronchopleural fistula, pneumothorax
  • Persistent hemodynamic instability despite appropriate resuscitation

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

24 participants in 2 patient groups

Recruitment maneuver (RM) sham group
Sham Comparator group
Description:
when recruitment maneuver sequence precedes a sham evaluation period
Treatment:
Other: Recruitment Maneuver (RM) sham group
Sham Recruitment (RM) maneuver group
Sham Comparator group
Description:
a group in which patients receive a sham sequence before the RM sequence
Treatment:
Other: Sham recruitment maneuver (RM) group

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems