Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The overall aim of this study is to compare three different care models for patients with hip- and knee osteoarthritis. The primary aim is to evaluate whether an app-based care model is more beneficial for improving function in daily life than a web-based care model and standard care for patients with hip and / or knee osteoarthritis
Full description
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate whether an app-based care model is more beneficial for improving function in daily life than a web-based care model and standard care for patients with hip and / or knee osteoarthritis. The secondary aims are to evaluate how 1) patient-related outcome measures regarding the ability of the patient to "forget" about their problematic joint after treatment, quality of life, pain-related self-efficacy, and level of physical activity and 2) care consumption, cost-effectiveness, and carbon footprint differ between the three care models in a short-term (three months) and long-term perspective (one and three years respectively). Further aims are to evaluate how patient experience of the benefits provided by the two digital care models differs, how patient experience with respect to work alliance differs between the three care models, describe the adherence to using the app in the app-based care model and to describe what patient characteristics are associated with clinically meaningful improvements in function in daily life among patients recieving app-based care. The primary hypothesis is that patients who are randomized to an app-based care model will improve significantly more in terms of function in daily life from baseline to one year compared with patients who are randomized to a web-based model and usual care. The secondary hypothesis is that patients randomized to the app-based care model change equivalently from baseline to one year in terms of patient-reported measures, but that the app-based care model is more cost-effective compared with the other two care models at one and three years, respectively.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
The participant:
Exclusion criteria
Patients:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
315 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Susanne Beischer, PhD; Maziar Mohaddes, Assoc Prof
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal