ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Dilute Epinephrine vs Tourniquet for Visualization in Ankle Arthroscopy: A RCT

Zhejiang University logo

Zhejiang University

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Chronic Ankle Instability
Ankle Arthroscopy
Ankle Ligament Injury

Treatments

Drug: Epinephrine group
Device: Tourniquet group

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07349407
2025-1632

Details and patient eligibility

About

This multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial investigates the effect of dilute epinephrine irrigation versus tourniquet use on visual field clarity (VFC) during ankle arthroscopy. Patients are randomized into an epinephrine group (normal saline with 1 mL of 1:1000 epinephrine per 3 L bag; tourniquet placed but not inflated unless needed) or a standard tourniquet group. The primary outcome is arthroscopic visual field clarity assessed using a 4-point Likert-style numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain intensity at 2 and 24 hours (VAS), and the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and cardiovascular adverse events.

Full description

Study Objective and Design

This study aims to evaluate the effect of dilute epinephrine irrigation versus tourniquet use on visual field clarity (VFC) during ankle arthroscopic surgery, while also assessing the incidence of hypotension/bradycardia events and potential cardiovascular adverse effects.

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the intraoperative arthroscopic field clarity between patients receiving epinephrine-containing irrigation and those undergoing surgery with a tourniquet.

Participants are randomized into two groups:

Epinephrine Group: Irrigation fluid consists of normal saline mixed with 1 mL of 1:1000 epinephrine per 3-liter bag. A tourniquet is placed but not inflated; it may be inflated as a rescue measure if necessary.

Tourniquet Group: Standard tourniquet application as routinely practiced.

3.2.4 Primary Efficacy Outcome

Visual field clarity (VFC) under ankle arthroscopy, assessed using a Likert-style 4-point numeric rating scale (NRS).

3.2.5 Secondary Efficacy Outcomes

Pain intensity scores at 2 and 24 hours postoperatively, measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Enrollment

88 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

15 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to understand the procedures and methods of the clinical trial
  • voluntarily provide written informed consent
  • Aged from 15 to 65 years old , regardless of sex
  • Diagnosed with a condition requiring ankle surgery
  • Be scheduled to undergo unilateral ankle arthroscopy

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who decline to participate in the study
  • Known history of heart disease (e.g., coronary artery disease, cardiac conduction abnormalities), diabetes, or asthma
  • Poorly controlled hypertension
  • Age under 15 years or above 65 years old
  • Intellectual disability
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Known allergy to sulfites

Contraindications to ISBPB (including planned injection site infection, pre-existing neurological deficits, allergy to local anesthetics, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or contralateral phrenic nerve dysfunction)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

88 participants in 2 patient groups

Epinephrine group
Experimental group
Treatment:
Drug: Epinephrine group
Tourniquet group
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Tourniquet group

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

zongyou Pan, Doctoral degree

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems