ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Direct Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulator Parameter Settings

Case Western Reserve University logo

Case Western Reserve University

Status

Completed

Conditions

High-density Stimulation
High-frequency Stimulation
Spinal Cord Stimulation

Treatments

Device: High-frequency stimulation
Device: Sham Stimulation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05283863
10-13-29

Details and patient eligibility

About

(Primary)

  1. To compare the clinical effects and side effects of two different stimulation strategies that do not produce any sensory percept (1000 Hz and placebo) on clinical benefit for electrodes implanted for chronic pain as measured by the Visual Analog Pain Scale for back and leg pain, the Brief Pain Inventory, the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire.

    (Secondary)

  2. To compare the clinical effects of the subthreshold (paresthesia-free) stimulation patterns with conventional (paresthesia-producing) stimulation patterns to evaluate the necessity of paresthesias and current amplitudes on clinical benefit for pain.

  3. To identify the ability of subthreshold high-frequency to improve axial pain or the affective component of pain.

Full description

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of different stimulation patterns in patients undergoing implantation of neurostimulator systems for chronic medically intractable neuropathic pain. Research participants will be individuals who have undergone implantation of neurostimulator electrodes into the spinal column or peripheral nervous system for clinical treatment of neuropathic pain. All patients will already have undergone empiric programming of the stimulator using conventional settings (typically 40-60 Hz, 350-450 usec pulse width). However, other stimulation parameters, including high-frequency stimulation, are also feasible and FDA-approved using the implanted device, and it is possible to do this without producing a sensory percept, which makes it possible to test efficacy in a double blind manner. For this study, two different stimulation parameters will be tested during four two-week periods: 1000 Hz and placebo. Clinical response and side effect profile for each setting will be measured.

Enrollment

4 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-75 years
  • Diagnosis of chronic neuropathic pain for which placement of electrodes into the spinal column is planned for clinical indications (failed back surgery syndrome, peripheral neuropathy or complex regional pain syndrome)
  • History of implantation of spinal cord stimulation system with rechargeable implanted neurostimulator

Exclusion criteria

  • Significant dementia or other condition preventing informed consent by the patient.
  • Current drug or alcohol abuse or dependence.
  • Uncontrolled depression or anxiety or failure to pass psychological screening for spinal cord stimulation.
  • Inability or unwillingness to cooperate with clinical testing.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

4 participants in 2 patient groups

High-Frequency Stimulation, Then Placebo Stimulation
Experimental group
Description:
Participants first receive sub-threshold high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (1200 Hz frequency, 200 μsec pulse width, and an amplitude 90% of the threshold for detection of a sensory percept) for 2 weeks. After a 2-week washout period, they then receive sham spinal cord stimulation (1200 Hz at 0 V amplitude) for 2 weeks.
Treatment:
Device: High-frequency stimulation
Device: Sham Stimulation
Placebo Stimulation, Then High-Frequency Stimulation
Sham Comparator group
Description:
Participants first receive sham spinal cord stimulation (1200 Hz at 0 V amplitude) for 2 weeks. After a 2-week washout period, they then receive sub-threshold high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (1200 Hz frequency, 200 μsec pulse width, and an amplitude 90% of the threshold for detection of a sensory percept) for 2 weeks.
Treatment:
Device: High-frequency stimulation
Device: Sham Stimulation

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems