ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Direct Warming Frozen Embryo Transfer Outcomes in Assisted Reproductive Technology (DW-FET-RCT)

The Chinese University of Hong Kong logo

The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
Cryopreservation of Embryos
Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET)
Pregnancy Outcome After in Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

Treatments

Other: Conventional Multi-step Thawing Method
Other: Direct Warming Method

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06741748
2024.132-T

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the direct warming method for frozen embryo transfers (FET) can improve live birth and pregnancy outcomes in women aged 18-45 undergoing IVF treatments. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the direct warming method achieve a similar or higher clinical success rate for FET compared to the conventional multi-step method?
  • Is the direct warming method more cost-effective than the conventional method?

Researchers will compare the direct warming method to the conventional multi-step method to see if the former leads to better pregnancy outcomes and reduced procedural time.

Participants will:

  • Undergo either the one-step or conventional embryo thawing procedure.
  • Complete standard clinical follow-ups for pregnancy, including ultrasound scans and pregnancy tests.

Full description

This clinical trial explores a novel direct warming method for frozen embryo transfer (FET), aimed at improving both clinical and operational outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). The method was designed to simplify and accelerate the embryo thawing process, reducing the time needed for thawing while eliminating the use of cryoprotectants commonly required in conventional thawing methods. This innovation has the potential to offer a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to standard FET procedures.

The primary focus of this trial is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the direct warming method against the conventional multi-step thawing process. In particular, the study seeks to determine whether the new method yields comparable or superior outcomes in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), and live birth rate (LBR), while also assessing its overall cost-effectiveness.

Study Design and Technical Details

This study employs a randomized controlled design, with participants being allocated into either the intervention group (direct warming method) or the control group (conventional multi-step thawing). The direct warming method streamlines the thawing process to just 3 minutes, in contrast to the conventional method, which requires multiple stages and takes approximately 20 minutes. By using only an embryo culture medium without cryoprotectants, the direct warming method reduces both complexity and potential risks associated with handling and cryoprotectant toxicity.

Key Objectives

  • Primary Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the direct warming method in achieving comparable or higher success rates for FET as compared to conventional multi-step thawing.
  • Secondary Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of the direct warming method by comparing the consumable and time costs across different centers.

Expected Impact and Innovation

The direct warming method challenges the traditional multi-step thawing approach, offering a faster and simpler alternative without compromising clinical outcomes. By minimizing the need for cryoprotectants and reducing the complexity of the thawing process, the new method is expected to enhance the overall efficiency of FET procedures while maintaining or improving pregnancy success rates. Additionally, the cost and time savings associated with the direct warming method may make it a viable option for IVF clinics worldwide, driving standardization and consistency across clinical settings.

Enrollment

578 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 45 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Plan to undergo single embryo transfer (SET) during the FET cycle.
  • Age between 18 and 45 years.
  • Patients with at least one high-quality blastocyst available for transfer.
  • Patients who have provided informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) or recurrent miscarriage (RM).
  • Patients with known uterine anomalies or significant uterine pathology (e.g., fibroids, polyps).
  • Patients who are unwilling or unable to provide informed consent.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

578 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Direct Warming method
Experimental group
Description:
The blastocyst designated for thawing will be placed in a pre-warmed, direct warming medium for one minute. Afterward, the embryo is transferred into an embryo culture medium within a time-lapse system, where it remains until the patient is ready for the embryo transfer procedure. This direct warming method significantly reduces the total procedure time to approximately 3 minutes, making it about ten times faster than the conventional multi-step thawing method.
Treatment:
Other: Direct Warming Method
Conventional multi-step thawing method
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
In the conventional multi-step thawing method, vitrified blastocysts are sequentially thawed using a series of pre-warmed thawing, dilution, and washing solutions. The blastocyst is first placed in a thawing solution for 1-3 minutes, followed by immersion in a dilution solution for 4-6 minutes to reduce cryoprotectant concentration. Finally, the blastocyst is transferred to a washing solution for 5-10 minutes for rehydration. The entire process takes approximately 30 minutes, after which the embryo is placed into an embryo culture medium in a time-lapse system until it is ready for embryo transfer.
Treatment:
Other: Conventional Multi-step Thawing Method

Trial contacts and locations

3

Loading...

Central trial contact

Waner Wu, MPhil; Yiu Leung D Chan, DPhil

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems